<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[left_160x600_1]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

Discussion on Article:
Sony Denies Usage of 65nm Chips in Latest PlayStation 3 Model.

Started by: kmkkk | Date 11/05/07 02:51:04 PM
Comments: 6 | Last Comment:  11/07/07 01:51:40 PM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-5]

1. 
Does this mean that when the PS3 is on 65nm that it will be even cheaper? $349? I'm still waiting it out. Not worth buying yet. Especially with MGS4 getting pushed back and lair turning out to be bad.
[Posted by: kmkkk | Date: 11/05/07 02:51:04 PM]

2. 
wake me up when the price hits 300$

I won't pay a cent more for a console
[Posted by: huh | Date: 11/05/07 04:15:19 PM]

3. 
Why do people even bothering replying to articles not about a price drop just to say they only care about a price drop? If they are saying its still too expensive, it's getting old as Sony has already dropped the price to an unrealistically low heights.
[Posted by: RW | Date: 11/05/07 08:24:48 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

4. 
Your comments on the RSX-chip are false, and the new 40GB is very capable of playing PS1 games. also Sony stated that NO they haven't used 65nm yet, the 90nm Cell in teh 40GB version is a NEW revision of the Cell proc, which is one of the reasons why the 40GB has less powerconsumption as the old one..
[Posted by: SuperDre | Date: 11/06/07 04:43:33 AM]

5. 
Good news I guess... since then it will mean that once they shrink it, it will be even cheaper for them to produce and consume less power.
Is PS3 noisy?
[Posted by: aha | Date: 11/07/07 01:51:40 PM]

[1-5]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me