Hardware News
Galleries
Forums
Links
Check Prices
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
Home
CPU
Mainboards
Memory
Video
Storage
Multimedia
Cooling/PSU
Monitors
Networking
Mobile
Other
Search
Newsletter
Services
RSS
PDA | Mobile
Enter E-mail to manage your subscription
Make Home Page
Add to Favorites
All articles and hardware news
Articles only
News only
PDA/Mobile optimized site:
http://pda.xbitlabs.com
<%BANNER[left_160x600_1]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
Discussion
<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>
Discussion on Article:
Intel Unveils Central Processing Units Made Using 45nm Process Tech.
Started by:
K |
Date
11/12/07 03:17:58 PM
Comments:
16 |
Last Comment:
11/16/07 10:01:48 AM
Expand all threads
|
Collapse all threads
[
1-7
]
1.
There is no "Advanced Micro Devices"
There is only AMD these days
[
Posted by:
K |
Date:
11/12/07 03:17:58 PM]
You must log in to reply
2.
There is no "AMD"
There is only "DAAMIT" and its incresingly frustratred stock holders.
[
Posted by:
Joz |
Date:
11/12/07 03:33:21 PM]
You must log in to reply
3.
Another victory for Intel.
Oh I just want to make out with that company.
[
Posted by:
Mr. BonBon |
Date:
11/13/07 12:27:40 AM]
You must log in to reply
4.
Geeeee Intel is so superior.
150W TDP CPU. AMD cpus only does 120W.
AMD is lame.
And so many Intel dumb dumb fanboys here.
[
Posted by:
Joker |
Date:
11/13/07 04:15:43 AM]
You must log in to reply
+ expand thread (5 answers)
- collapse thread
this is a classic loser fanboy comment...
[
Posted by:
what a joker |
Date:
11/13/07 04:57:49 AM]
You must log in to reply
/vouch
that quad at $209 is going to be a huge DAAMIT killer, I dont care what anyone says.
And, im betting the desktop version might even be priced less ($190 or so.), that would KILL DAAMIT in the entire uper/middle-low end to lower-high end.
[
Posted by:
Joz |
Date:
11/13/07 06:31:51 AM]
You must log in to reply
Difference is that Intel is like 100W below its 150W TDP while AMD processors consume just as much as their TDP (or sometimes way more -> QFX)
[
Posted by:
1234 |
Date:
11/13/07 06:39:20 AM]
You must log in to reply
AMD must be religious thing since fanclub ignores lack of any comparable hardware in both CPU and Video
[
Posted by:
muzzle8410 |
Date:
11/13/07 08:07:55 AM]
You must log in to reply
If AMD released a quad core for around $150, I would buy it...
[
Posted by:
31415 |
Date:
11/13/07 04:32:02 PM]
You must log in to reply
5.
meh its always the same story
[
Posted by:
Eddi |
Date:
11/13/07 07:40:18 AM]
You must log in to reply
6.
what a glorious lineup ,prices could be lower but also I could earn more
[
Posted by:
muzzle8410 |
Date:
11/13/07 08:05:03 AM]
You must log in to reply
+ expand thread (4 answers)
- collapse thread
no, prices could be lower
[
Posted by:
meho |
Date:
11/14/07 12:20:20 PM]
You must log in to reply
no... go get a job
[
Posted by:
tech wannabe |
Date:
11/14/07 06:25:38 PM]
You must log in to reply
someones not looking out for the consumer.... you on intels payroll?
[
Posted by:
0988 |
Date:
11/15/07 07:02:38 AM]
You must log in to reply
nope... i just happen to have a good job that helps pay for tech-toys...
[
Posted by:
tech wannabe |
Date:
11/15/07 07:11:29 AM]
You must log in to reply
7.
When is the Nehalem coming out?
Because if it's close to the release of the Penryn then I
might just go with a Nehalem.
Octo-cores anyone and Intel's socket B?
http://www.behardware.com/news/8644/socket-b-bloomfield-i -2008.html
[
Posted by:
klsjdf |
Date:
11/16/07 10:01:48 AM]
You must log in to reply
[
1-7
]
Back to the Article
You must log in to add comments.
Forgot password?
Registration
Username
Password
remember me