Make Home Page
Add to Favorites
1.
With specs like that, why not start from windows 2000? I'm sure that they could adapt it much more quickly than XP
[Posted by: cheeseman | Date: 12/07/07 01:25:36 PM]
Discussion
Discussion on Article:
Microsoft Wants Stripped-Down Windows XP to Run on OLPC’s XO Next Year.
Started by: cheeseman | Date 12/07/07 01:25:36 PM
Comments: 7 | Last Comment: 12/10/07 01:44:19 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads
[1-3]
2.
I've modified Windows XP to make it work on embedded systems with much lower capability than the OLPC (half as much of everything). I'm not quite sure why they're making a fuss of having 40 engineers working on it full-time and still not being able to finish it for another 6 months, because it's not that difficult, and Windows runs fine on such a system.
[Posted by: MTX | Date: 12/08/07 09:27:41 AM]
3.
Why even try to do it ?
It is more then obvious that Linux is better choice in terms of performance and cost.
WTF wrong with You people ?
There is no reason to be a Microsoft slave.
It is more then obvious that Linux is better choice in terms of performance and cost.
WTF wrong with You people ?
There is no reason to be a Microsoft slave.
[Posted by: n0nsense | Date: 12/09/07 08:54:09 AM]
[1-3]
You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Our Sponsors
