Make Home Page
Add to Favorites
XbitLabs is using Twitter
Windows Live Alerts
1.
what about the power consumption?
[Posted by: jm 
| Date: 01/14/08 11:07:14 PM]
| Date: 01/14/08 11:07:14 PM]
Discussion
Discussion on Article:
Celeron E1200: Dual-Core Processor Almost for Free
Started by: jm | Date 01/14/08 11:07:14 PM
Comments: 53 | Last Comment: 07/21/08 09:06:52 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads
[1-20 | 21-30]
2.
You could have done an across-the-whole-range cache size comparison, with results for E2XXX and E4XXX processors also, but, apart from that, It really is a very useful article, and one we may not see in most other websites, which are much too centered around the ultra-high-end
thanks for paying attention to the lower parts of the market
thanks for paying attention to the lower parts of the market
[Posted by: NormanBates | Date: 01/15/08 12:38:36 AM]
| Date: 01/15/08 12:38:36 AM]3.
I was hoping for this to be better at gaming, might of picked up a couple for cheap lan boxes. But looks like E21xx is clearly the better choice.
[Posted by: seed | Date: 01/15/08 01:48:35 AM]
| Date: 01/15/08 01:48:35 AM]4.
So it seems that Intel remains king when it comes to value. Overclocking a E2xx chip by almost 100% is rather common these days.
[Posted by: Mr. BonBon | Date: 01/15/08 02:10:02 AM]
| Date: 01/15/08 02:10:02 AM]5.
How much power does this CPU consume compared to say E2160 of Athlon X2's?
If this CPU consumes even a few W's less than E2160, then it sounds perfect for a home server.
If this CPU consumes even a few W's less than E2160, then it sounds perfect for a home server.
[Posted by: Lowpower | Date: 01/15/08 03:44:37 AM]
| Date: 01/15/08 03:44:37 AM]6.
Where are all AMD fanboys which were claiming that we will pay $1000 for a dual core CPU if Intel wins the CPU war??
Cheap dual core CPUs are here to stay....
Cheap dual core CPUs are here to stay....
[Posted by: notafanboy | Date: 01/15/08 04:46:51 AM]
| Date: 01/15/08 04:46:51 AM]7.
Sorry, AMD only lowered prices of their X2 cpus when Intel Core2 beat them soundly.
[Posted by: SorryAMD | Date: 01/15/08 07:43:38 AM]
| Date: 01/15/08 07:43:38 AM]8.
Good review but power consumption missing.
And the same error than everywhere. You cannot make a conclusion about gaming using a nvida 880GTX at only 1024*768. You should use an slower card or higher resolution because nobody will use that card to play at 1024*768 and the benchmarks would change tremendously.
And the same error than everywhere. You cannot make a conclusion about gaming using a nvida 880GTX at only 1024*768. You should use an slower card or higher resolution because nobody will use that card to play at 1024*768 and the benchmarks would change tremendously.
[Posted by: Sergioytc | Date: 01/15/08 09:50:06 AM]
| Date: 01/15/08 09:50:06 AM]9.
Nice review but power consumption should have been mentioned.
[Posted by: !!! | Date: 01/15/08 01:14:56 PM]
| Date: 01/15/08 01:14:56 PM]10.
Nice job keeping the low-end at a low price point!
AMD Fanboys... altogether now... 1, 2, 3... cry!!!!!
priceless!!
AMD Fanboys... altogether now... 1, 2, 3... cry!!!!!
priceless!!
[Posted by: anti-"AMD Fanboy" | Date: 01/15/08 11:31:32 PM]
| Date: 01/15/08 11:31:32 PM]11.
I would like to see a (system) consumption comparison between a 945GM and/or G31 system with this celeron, the E2140 and E4200 and a low-power AMD system. I currently have an AMD x2 4000+ on a nforce 6100+MCP430 with only 1 laptop HDD (no optical drive) which consumes (according to my APC UPS) 56W in idle and 108W in full CPU load. I would love to replace it with a system with less consumption, but I don't have the money for research.
PS: I know about VIA systems and they are too underpowered for my needs. I'm running gentoo on it, so it needs "compilation power".
PS: I know about VIA systems and they are too underpowered for my needs. I'm running gentoo on it, so it needs "compilation power".
[Posted by: mathew7 | Date: 01/15/08 11:31:46 PM]
| Date: 01/15/08 11:31:46 PM]12.
I would like to see a power consumption test of this CPU
[Posted by: ale | Date: 01/16/08 05:24:04 AM]
| Date: 01/16/08 05:24:04 AM]13.
Doesn't make much sense to buy a CPU cooler that is almost as expensive as the CPU to be able to overclock it that high. A test with the stock cooler would be more interesting for those who are looking for super cheap PC.
[Posted by: dagas | Date: 01/16/08 01:46:16 PM]
| Date: 01/16/08 01:46:16 PM]14.
Also It would be interesting to compare the AMD64 X2 to Celly
at the same clock speed, to see if only the level 2 cache makes the difference in normal core 2 versus AMD64 x2 ?
But I guess brisbane is 2 X 512k and E1200 is 1 X 512 Kb or ??
at the same clock speed, to see if only the level 2 cache makes the difference in normal core 2 versus AMD64 x2 ?
But I guess brisbane is 2 X 512k and E1200 is 1 X 512 Kb or ??
[Posted by: Cpu_freak | Date: 01/16/08 03:29:44 PM]
| Date: 01/16/08 03:29:44 PM]15.
AMD needs a dual core Sempron class CPU, and they need it fast, because the Celly 1200 is clearly aimed at huge OEMs; it's actually nice to see that the Celeron is again a decent CPU, like the old 333 from the past.
But for my point of view, the price difference between the 1200 Celeron and the E21xx is not worth the trouble, just get a baby Conroe if you want a valuable CPU and you want to OC; but if you don't want to OC, the X2 line up to the 4800+ is a better choice... then again, there will be truck loads of dual core Celrons heading to the OEMs.
But for my point of view, the price difference between the 1200 Celeron and the E21xx is not worth the trouble, just get a baby Conroe if you want a valuable CPU and you want to OC; but if you don't want to OC, the X2 line up to the 4800+ is a better choice... then again, there will be truck loads of dual core Celrons heading to the OEMs.
[Posted by: STB | Date: 01/17/08 07:36:39 AM]
| Date: 01/17/08 07:36:39 AM]16.
this E1200 may be the best choice for
24/7 SOHO opened web server. Very low
power consumption
24/7 SOHO opened web server. Very low
power consumption
[Posted by: newsun | Date: 01/18/08 12:42:23 PM]
| Date: 01/18/08 12:42:23 PM]17.
mengapa benckmark sangat tidak fair, amd tidak dikasih chipset terbaru 790 series, sedangkan celeran dikash x 38, bandingkan saja performa amd 4000 + lebih jelek dari review april war price amd vs intel
[Posted by: yadi | Date: 01/18/08 08:57:51 PM]
| Date: 01/18/08 08:57:51 PM]18.
It seems obvious to me that the new celeron is going to have to drop down to the $40/ sub $40 mark to be king.
[Posted by: Ptah | Date: 01/19/08 03:57:05 AM]
| Date: 01/19/08 03:57:05 AM]19.
I just purchased this Celeron Dual Core ( I was surprised to find one at my local Micro Center) It is an excellent little CPU and it runs ice cold. Perfect for my wife to use. Significant improvement over her old Socket 754 AMD Sempron 2800+.
I will probably not OC, It doesn't seem to need it.
I will probably not OC, It doesn't seem to need it.
[Posted by: Celery Stick | Date: 01/20/08 07:50:17 PM]
| Date: 01/20/08 07:50:17 PM][1-20 | 21-30]
Our Sponsors
