Search<%BANNER[left_130x130_1]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x300]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
<%BANNER[right_130x600]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
DiscussionDiscussion on Article:
Started by: Black Edition | Date 03/12/08
Comments: 7 | Last Comment: 03/13/08
[1-2]
1. Alright! Way to go AMD! You're only very good at reducing prices!
[Posted by: Black Edition | Date: 03/12/08]
 At least they got the TLB fixed. They are also supposed to be releasing tri-core toliman and dual-core kuma soon.
[Posted by: cheeseman | Date: 03/13/08]
who gives a crap?!? they just couldn't come up with something good these days...
[Posted by: Black Edition | Date: 03/13/08]
2. I want a Core 2 Quad Q4600
Easily overclockable. Cheap to produce [Posted by: Joz | Date: 03/12/08]
How is a large quad core/two dual cores cheap to produce? I think you're just assuming it'll have a cheap price tag because it'll be clocked slower than the Q6600..
[Posted by: MonkRX | Date: 03/13/08]
maybe becouse #1 it has lower l2 = cheaper#2 its cheaper to produce as a double cheeseburguer then a monolithic. #3 it will be priced lower, becouse it IS slower, but not by much. But it will be much easier to overclock with its higher multi. and if it ihits the ~160 mark it will be god. [Posted by: Joz | Date: 03/13/08]
[1-2]
<%BANNER[banner_468x30]%>
|