Search<%BANNER[left_130x130_1]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x300]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
<%BANNER[right_130x600]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
DiscussionDiscussion on Article:
Started by: Joe | Date 03/27/08
Comments: 6 | Last Comment: 04/01/08
[1-6]
1. HMMM, and Intel announced that it has a 6 core coming up, maybe Intel will release it's 6 core by the time you can actually get a triple core. Then Intel could buy the Triple core from AMD (To help keep them afloat to avoid a monoply) and brand it as their Celron. He-He.
[Posted by: Joe | Date: 03/27/08]
2. The $150 is too much. They should sell it for around $75~80. Then I would maybe consider getting it...
[Posted by: 31415 | Date: 03/27/08]
3. Can't believe they are introducing a new model with the same old
flawed B2 stepping.Aside from the "snappy" feel IMC provides[which fades quick under heavy load anyway]there is little reason left to buy AMD chips.Only the low-end Brisbanes make sense right now. [Posted by: 939 | Date: 03/29/08]
4. I heard they are trying to get the Phenom 45nm chips out so they are going to stop fooling with the 65nm chips and just release them instead of wasting time trying to fix them. Getting out a decent 45nm chip would be much better than trying to screw with a flawed 65nm design that is already out dated.
[Posted by: unclesharkey | Date: 03/29/08]
5. You left out a couple key words in your opening sentence.
[Posted by: Toksyuryel | Date: 03/31/08]
6. "Advanced Micro Devices late on Wednesday unveiled the world’s first x86 desktop microprocessors. "
Nobody'll take on this crazy 32-bit AMD is peddling. We're doing just fine with our 16-bit systems! I do hope these are cheap... [Posted by: Lightnix | Date: 04/01/08]
[1-6]
<%BANNER[banner_468x30]%>
|