Search<%BANNER[left_130x130_1]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x300]%>
<%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
<%BANNER[right_130x600]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
DiscussionDiscussion on Article:
Started by: Joz | Date 04/08/08
Comments: 8 | Last Comment: 04/09/08
[1-2]
1. But can it play Crysis with Windows Vista Ultimate at 800x600 with max details?
[Posted by: Joz | Date: 04/08/08]
 I afraid even fastest x86 processor by this "lite Cell" if the Crysis developer is able to deliver an SPE optimized version
[Posted by: Core2Duo also suck! | Date: 04/08/08]
Crysis is garbage, their engine is total garbage. I think if same level of details were run by UT3 engine it would go smooth as butter on most modern gaming machines. Anyway at least Crysis guys got a lot of money from hardware compainies for doing such "advanced" engine.
[Posted by: BorgDrone | Date: 04/09/08]
2. I WANT ONE!
I've recently started converting my BR movies to 1080p x264 files for storage on a file server. My poor processor manages to encode them at only 1.15 fps...it takes two days to encode one movie. These new encoding/decoding cards sound perfect. [Posted by: Steve | Date: 04/08/08]
Even fastest Core2Duo is suck in encoding videoCell is the only solution! [Posted by: Core2Duo also suck! | Date: 04/08/08]
Your brain is phailure if Intel convinced you that you can do it with their Extreme Expensive garbage in 5 hours or less. AMD or Intel, its not issue here, because both are phailure here.
[Posted by: BorgDrone | Date: 04/09/08]
[1-2]
<%BANNER[banner_468x30]%>
|