Discussion

Discussion on Article:
Three Cores vs. Two: AMD Phenom X3 8750 Review

Started by: nx | Date 04/23/08 03:29:01 AM
Comments: 209 | Last Comment:  01/08/09 11:46:37 PM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-20 | 21-40 | 41-44]


41. 
very good!
This comparison show what us dont now.
[Posted by: dbns  | Date: 06/04/08 07:30:15 AM]

42. 
its awesome to get an idea of Microprocessors in 2days world.
[Posted by: Amit kulkarni  | Date: 06/26/08 04:55:34 AM]

43. 
Slow as the phenom x3 is ,as a mere piece of glorified sillicon it still is arguably more sentient than most of you posters. I think a prescription for "a life" is in order, just take three daily and you'll make up for all those missed years. And more imporantly you'll spare sensible sane people the suffering of reading you're comments. Thanks.
[Posted by: JimD  | Date: 07/23/08 12:15:26 AM]
+ expand thread (7 answers)

44. 
X-bit lab, you suck... I mean, look at your conclusion in the Photoshop CS3 benchmark... you say the program splits well the work load in parallel threads, and than concludes that the problem with x3 is clock frequency?! A 100MHz clocked faster x3 outperforms a x4, and this is well divided work load?! Get real you SOB...
[Posted by: Man  | Date: 07/24/08 08:21:52 PM]

[1-20 | 21-40 | 41-44]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me