Information

Dear forum members,
We are delighted to inform you that our forums are back online. Every single topic and post are now on their places and everything works just as before, only better. Welcome back!



Discussion

Discussion on Article:
The King Is Dead, Long Live the King: EVGA GeForce GTX 295+ Graphics Card Review

Started by: TAViX | Date 01/25/09 11:41:24 PM
Comments: 4 | Last Comment:  01/30/09 03:16:45 AM

[1-4]

1. 
Nice review! Still nvidia had half of year to make a better product than ATI so somehow the results are not surprising at all.
One question. For the 16xAA test did you use 4xAA with transparecy+edge detect or
16xAA with transparecy+box, for ATI i mean?
0 0 [Posted by: TAViX  | Date: 01/25/09 11:41:24 PM]
Reply

2. 
For ATI Radeon we used 8x AA with edge-detect filter and adaptive (transparency) AA. For Nvidia GeForce, mode 16xQ with 8 color and 16 coverage samples per pixel were used.
0 0 [Posted by: Vader@Xbit  | Date: 01/26/09 07:40:15 AM]
Reply

3. 
Bonjour.

Nice review, bon travail.

Je like to make a suggestion. It would be easier to follow the graphs if the Ati and Nvidia cards were in different shades, so we could distinguish. Or maybe have the card we are reviewing a different color in the graphs.

O lala, excuse my poor english, j'essaie.
0 0 [Posted by: Mr. BonBon  | Date: 01/26/09 09:58:01 AM]
Reply

4. 
The "King" of graphics cards is about as important as the monarch of england. This is s figurehead position, the symbolic significance of which is invariably over estimated. The disappearance of the $500 graphics card would mean nothing. Does anyone actually choose their $200 card because of the performance of the $500 card from the same manufacturer? Those people should be have their wallets taken away.
0 0 [Posted by: philosofool  | Date: 01/26/09 11:12:08 AM]
Reply

[1-4]

Back to the Article

Add your Comment