Information

Did you know you could become an X-bit labs fan on Facebook or follow us on Twitter?



Discussion

Discussion on Article:
The King Is Dead, Long Live the King: EVGA GeForce GTX 295+ Graphics Card Review

Started by: TAViX | Date 01/25/09 11:41:24 PM
Comments: 4 | Last Comment:  01/30/09 03:16:45 AM

[1-4]

1. 
Nice review! Still nvidia had half of year to make a better product than ATI so somehow the results are not surprising at all.
One question. For the 16xAA test did you use 4xAA with transparecy+edge detect or
16xAA with transparecy+box, for ATI i mean?
0 0 [Posted by: TAViX  | Date: 01/25/09 11:41:24 PM]
Reply
2. 
For ATI Radeon we used 8x AA with edge-detect filter and adaptive (transparency) AA. For Nvidia GeForce, mode 16xQ with 8 color and 16 coverage samples per pixel were used.
0 0 [Posted by: Vader@Xbit  | Date: 01/26/09 07:40:15 AM]
Reply
3. 
Bonjour.

Nice review, bon travail.

Je like to make a suggestion. It would be easier to follow the graphs if the Ati and Nvidia cards were in different shades, so we could distinguish. Or maybe have the card we are reviewing a different color in the graphs.

O lala, excuse my poor english, j'essaie.
0 0 [Posted by: Mr. BonBon  | Date: 01/26/09 09:58:01 AM]
Reply
4. 
The "King" of graphics cards is about as important as the monarch of england. This is s figurehead position, the symbolic significance of which is invariably over estimated. The disappearance of the $500 graphics card would mean nothing. Does anyone actually choose their $200 card because of the performance of the $500 card from the same manufacturer? Those people should be have their wallets taken away.
0 0 [Posted by: philosofool  | Date: 01/26/09 11:12:08 AM]
Reply

[1-4]

Back to the Article

Add your Comment


Our Sponsors

Crucial.com Western Digital G.Skill