Information

Did you know you could become an X-bit labs fan on Facebook or follow us on Twitter?



Discussion

Discussion on Article:
"Infinity Number Two": Scythe Mugen 2 Cooler Review

Started by: 3Dkiller | Date 03/03/09 11:08:24 AM
Comments: 3 | Last Comment:  04/08/10 08:30:31 PM

[1-3]

1. 
wow this went fast.. Thermolab baram lost from Scythe Mugen 2
while Thermolab baram won from the thermelright 120ultra LOL
Good review keep it up!.
0 0 [Posted by: 3Dkiller  | Date: 03/03/09 11:08:24 AM]
Reply

2. 
Am I the only one a little confused here? Using 2x1860RPM fans:

1) In the bar graphs (pg 8) @ 3.8GHz & 1.5V:
Mugen 2: 69 DegC MaxCore Baram: 70 DegC MaxCore
Winner: Mugen 2 by a hair (but really equal as w/in data error)

2)In the max OverClocking test Essentially BOTH @ 3.852GHz & 1.536V:
Mugen 2: 68 DegC MaxCore Baram: 64 DegC MaxCore
Winner: Baram SIGNIFICANTLY!

BUT BARAM result is QUESTIONABLE as it is so much lower than non-max 3.8GHz temp reported in bar chart (or is that report too high?)

Futhermore the max overclocking test shows:
Mugen 2: Cores 62-68 DegC loser? (w/ average of 64.0 DegC)
Baram : Cores 58-64 DegC winner? (w/ average of 60.5 DegC)

So which is it? I know these are old, but I would appreciate Sergey's reply. Thanks

BTW, I am/was interested in using he Mugen2 w/ 2 fans @ about 1200-1400 RPM. per Sergey's review 04/07/2008 http://www.xbitlabs.com/a...splay/fan-roundup_15.html
0 0 [Posted by: ValueDriven  | Date: 04/08/10 09:13:17 AM]
Reply

3. 
2)In the max OverClocking test Essentially BOTH @ 3.852GHz & 1.536V:
Mugen 2: 68 DegC MaxCore Baram: 64 DegC MaxCore
Winner: Baram SIGNIFICANTLY!

Baram: 72 DegC MaxCore
http://www.xbitlabs.com/m...6_bar_rec_big.png&1=1

Mugen 2: 70 DegC MaxCore
http://www.xbitlabs.com/m..._mug2_rec_big.png&1=1

You look in "Distance to TJ Max", but must look on "Maximum"
0 0 [Posted by: Jordan  | Date: 04/08/10 08:30:31 PM]
Reply

[1-3]

Back to the Article

Add your Comment