1.
I've been looking at Atom-based mobos for months now. I'm not sure this review does the uCPU justice.
In my investigation, this motherboard of all the Zotac Atom and other vendor mobos is the *least* desirable for a builder feature-wise. I would really have liked to have seen the Atom/ION evaluated on the 'Point of View ION-MB330 Dual Core 1.6GHz Atom N330 Mini-ITX Motherboard' or at least the 'Zotac IONITX-A-U Atom N330 1.6GHz Dual-Core 441 NVIDIA ION Mini ITX Motherboard'. It would also have been very informative to quantitatively contrast it to the Intel Atom 'benchmark' design.
In addition, this article made no mention of using the Atom/ION as a Home Server. Lots of users are using Atoms for Home Servers. The extreme low-power consumption and the low-horse power needed for byte swapping are ideal for an Atom. I would like to have seen an evaluation of any of the above mobos with Windows Home Server.
In general I thought this was a poor review. It did not properly compare and contrast the Atom/ION quantitatively with the alternatives. It chose the least desirable (IMO) motherboard to test. It ignored the Home Server application space. Not what I expected from Xbit Labs.
In my investigation, this motherboard of all the Zotac Atom and other vendor mobos is the *least* desirable for a builder feature-wise. I would really have liked to have seen the Atom/ION evaluated on the 'Point of View ION-MB330 Dual Core 1.6GHz Atom N330 Mini-ITX Motherboard' or at least the 'Zotac IONITX-A-U Atom N330 1.6GHz Dual-Core 441 NVIDIA ION Mini ITX Motherboard'. It would also have been very informative to quantitatively contrast it to the Intel Atom 'benchmark' design.
In addition, this article made no mention of using the Atom/ION as a Home Server. Lots of users are using Atoms for Home Servers. The extreme low-power consumption and the low-horse power needed for byte swapping are ideal for an Atom. I would like to have seen an evaluation of any of the above mobos with Windows Home Server.
In general I thought this was a poor review. It did not properly compare and contrast the Atom/ION quantitatively with the alternatives. It chose the least desirable (IMO) motherboard to test. It ignored the Home Server application space. Not what I expected from Xbit Labs.



| Date: 08/05/09 07:31:40 AM]
| Date: 08/06/09 02:46:17 AM]
| Date: 08/06/09 09:17:36 AM]
| Date: 08/17/09 04:33:02 AM]
