Discussion

Discussion on Article:
Nvidia Condemns Intel for Postponing of SuperSpeed USB Implementation to 2011.

Started by: JonMCC33 | Date 11/02/09 11:09:43 AM
Comments: 3 | Last Comment:  11/07/09 05:18:40 AM

[1-3]

1. 
...stability of Intel’s chipsets has always been better compared to Nvidia nForce.


QFT! First nVIDIA chipset I had was an nForce4 on an Asus A8N32-SLI. It was also my last. What a horrible motherboard and horrible stability.
[Posted by: JonMCC33  | Date: 11/02/09 11:09:43 AM]
You must log in to reply
2. 
Quote:

"While Nvidia’s chipsets offered better overclockability compared to Intel’s own core-logic for Pentium 4/D and Core 2 microprocessors"

MuaHahahahaha oh man what have you been smokin
[Posted by: alpha0ne  | Date: 11/03/09 12:17:14 AM]
You must log in to reply
3. 
Only reason for nforce was to use SLi, as it`s suck now seriously to CF, no reason for Ncrap.


"Nvidia nForce chipsets have traditionally been full of innovative features"

Like what - hybrid sli DD
[Posted by: Nameisis  | Date: 11/07/09 05:18:40 AM]
You must log in to reply

[1-3]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me

Our Sponsors

Western Digital Epiphan Systems