Discussion

Discussion on Article:
Ultra High-Definition Television Due in 2017 – 2022 Timeframe, Say Analysts.

Started by: uibo | Date 11/03/09 02:35:46 PM
Comments: 7 | Last Comment:  11/05/09 11:48:05 PM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-6]

1. 
Is my apartment going to get bigger too?
At 1080p and my viewing distance of 8 feet I would need a 50'' TV to notice the full benefits of 1080p.
Clearly this is only for the richest.
[Posted by: uibo  | Date: 11/03/09 02:35:46 PM]
You must log in to reply
2. 
I'd bet against that. There are sharply diminishing returns. Resolution beyond 1080p is no longer an important limiting factor in video quality. And number of speakers beyond whatever that number is these days. Without a real improvement in quality, you rely on marketing and misinformation to sell products. That seems to be what In-Stat's study is rather than real research.
[Posted by: CSMR  | Date: 11/03/09 02:37:16 PM]
You must log in to reply
3. 
Please tell me that this is a super early April Fools joke!

Are In-Stat shares traded publicly? I'd like to short them. They're clueless!
[Posted by: guney  | Date: 11/04/09 02:47:35 PM]
You must log in to reply
4. 
UHD may improve audio dramatically and enable 22.2 multi-channel three-dimensional sound

You can't use the word dramatically to indicate improvement. Use the word "drastically". Dramatically by definition is change to the worse.
[Posted by: Mastrom  | Date: 11/05/09 12:59:33 AM]
You must log in to reply
+ expand thread (1 answer)
5. 
Well I can see their 2160p making some sense... There are quite a lot people that have huge screens even today. Not that I think one really needs them, but they are fun. On these huge screens I think a lille better res makes sense. Not a lot though - you're not sitting right in front of these screens, but at a fair bit of a distance, so there's a limit to what you can resolve.

I think they should up the frame rate first and make sure it's p not i.
At our local video store they show a national geographic Blue ray on a huge screen. It's a disaster! Yea, when the image is still it looks pretty cool, but when the camera moves the image jitters like hell.
But then again most people don't realize, they just see it's huge and HD so it gotta be great.
God blessed the stupid.
M.
[Posted by: mschira  | Date: 11/05/09 02:50:06 AM]
You must log in to reply
6. 
3-D and framerate up first, then you can think about UHD
like Philips system:
http://www.wired.com/scie...veries/news/2006/08/71627
[Posted by: CyberAngel  | Date: 11/05/09 11:48:05 PM]
You must log in to reply

[1-6]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me

Our Sponsors

Western Digital Epiphan Systems