Article seems very biased towards Intel, i even didn't read whole article just wanted to see the conclusion at first so that what xbitlabs has to say.
Wow its just like comparing the salary and role of a management person and a fresher. Why to pay such a high salary for a dumb performer?
So we don't pay for Intel's low end CPUs. Intel should invest money in marketing and making and spreading fake reviews.
The performance AMD gives in $100 is offered by $400 CPU of Intel. I don't wana read any of xbitlabs reviews again :-#. There should be a bar of benchmark.
Intel had no GPU strength, i want to ask xbitlabs that are they saying
"Intel's HD graphics is better than ATI"
If you say this then say SandyBridge is better than AMD Fusion.
Intel can make CPU but they are not smart enough to beat AMD-ATI and NVIDIA in a shot.
Below is an analogy -
Intel is to Microsoft, AMD is to Linux.
That's it. You know what Monopoly MS does, same is here with Intel.
09/14/11 12:30:56 AM]