Information

Dear forum members,
We are delighted to inform you that our forums are back online. Every single topic and post are now on their places and everything works just as before, only better. Welcome back!



Discussion

Discussion on Article:
Palit GT 240 Sonic and Gainward GeForce GT240 1024MB GDDR5 GS: Worthy Replacement for GeForce 9600 GT

Started by: Simplex | Date 12/25/09 09:58:01 AM
Comments: 7 | Last Comment:  01/07/10 09:04:54 AM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-6]

1. 
If this card is both slower AND more expensive than 9600GT than how can it be a "worthy" replacement? If it offered better performance at the same price point or comparable performance for the same price, or if it was both cheaper and faster - then we could talk about "worthiness".
Guys at HardOCP got it right - they were not impressed with that card:

http://www.hardocp.com/ar...gt_240_video_card_review/
0 0 [Posted by: Simplex  | Date: 12/25/09 09:58:01 AM]
Reply

2. 
I think that without 4xFSAA in all tests the 9600gts 16 ROPs would beat the 240gt like on other sites.
I dont know why every graphic card from the lowest lowend needs to be tested with 4xFSAA on this site. At least add numbers without antialiasing for weaker cards if u already test them.
0 0 [Posted by: Zool  | Date: 12/25/09 11:17:54 AM]
Reply

3. 
"Unfortunately, the Radeon HD 4770 cannot compete with the Radeon HD 4770". I'm confused?
0 2 [Posted by: genie  | Date: 12/25/09 06:52:06 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Will be corrected ASAP, thanks.
0 0 [Posted by: Vader@Xbit  | Date: 12/26/09 05:17:11 AM]
Reply

4. 
First of all, thank you for reviewing the GT 240 in a separate article. But it would be nice if there's power consumption figures for both Palit and Gainward's cards, and even the reference if possible. To show the difference between different memory and frequency configurations. I'm guessing this is why the 3d gaming power consumption figure is different than the one in the GT 220 review?

One more thing, what about the video test results? Is it identical to GT 220?
0 0 [Posted by: bamkapowpow  | Date: 12/26/09 06:05:57 AM]
Reply

5. 
Not bad review for gamers ,but guys you forget to mention what GT 240 do with cuda,some test or comparation with CPU or Nvidia cant offer something special with cuda with this card.
0 1 [Posted by: Blackcode  | Date: 12/27/09 12:37:49 AM]
Reply

6. 
How come there were no video playback quality tests like you did for the GT 220/240???
0 0 [Posted by: edlivian  | Date: 01/07/10 09:04:54 AM]
Reply

[1-6]

Back to the Article

Add your Comment