Information

Dear forum members,
We are delighted to inform you that our forums are back online. Every single topic and post are now on their places and everything works just as before, only better. Welcome back!



Discussion

Discussion on Article:
AMD May Be Preparing Phenom II X8 Microprocessors.

Started by: nforce4max | Date 12/23/11 06:02:32 AM
Comments: 35 | Last Comment:  10/27/13 05:37:09 PM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-16]

1. 
I want a real Phenom x8 rather than a BD spit shine and a rebage. -_-

8 0 [Posted by: nforce4max  | Date: 12/23/11 06:02:32 AM]
Reply

2. 
Seriously AMD stop going after the core counter... I don't care how much raw performance the CPU give in a situation like a 3D scene render.
I care for the overall performance I get in everyday use, that is until more than half of my software is using more than the 6 cores (which I have now).

I love to do 3d renders, but I need per core performance to compose the scene first.
3 0 [Posted by: nitro912gr  | Date: 12/23/11 07:04:26 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
They cannot compete against Intel single thread performance. They need(ed) throughout.
0 1 [Posted by: Marburg U  | Date: 12/23/11 01:54:44 PM]
Reply
 
actually gooing higher in core count would be really good because we get stuck if they didn't . programmers make there software for 4 cores because no one has 8 cores. so if we go to 8 cores now the software makers will have a reason to higher there thread count.
0 0 [Posted by: massau  | Date: 12/24/11 04:58:23 AM]
Reply

3. 
Too slow frequency...I need AMD Phenom II X8 3060: 3.60GHz( by manufacturer default), ~132W, --> or AMD Phenom II X8 3080: 3.80GHz, 140W! + Overclock to 4.6GHz or more 24/7
LoL supercomputer on my desk
1 1 [Posted by: Anton Markov  | Date: 12/23/11 07:24:38 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
i just wish it has high a number of IPC to get a supercomputer

a good idea for AMD is to not-stop making new Athlons and phenoms while selling fusions and bulldozers

the problem is that some corporations stop some great projects, which are successful and cost billions for no reason, remember GeoCities, AMD geode, .....

maybe the BIOS update means piledriver, the 9XX series chipset support them and they fit in AM3+ sockets, and it's also an engineering sample
0 0 [Posted by: madooo12  | Date: 12/24/11 01:37:58 PM]
Reply

4. 
Looks like they are Zambezi w/o L3.
0 1 [Posted by: Azazel  | Date: 12/23/11 08:29:49 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Stripping the L3 cache away probably going to do "wonders" for the performance. I'll facepalm if a Phenom II X6 craps all over the X8 and kicks it to the curb.
1 0 [Posted by: Joe Public  | Date: 12/23/11 08:48:04 AM]
Reply
 
Thanks for a suggestion.
1 0 [Posted by: Anton  | Date: 12/23/11 04:59:20 PM]
Reply
 
considering the large L2 I don't think its going to make that much difference on the desktop.
1 0 [Posted by: Countess  | Date: 12/27/11 04:41:50 PM]
Reply

5. 
By the end of decade, are we going to see any AMDs with more than 3.5Ghz freq??? I bet my belt that NO.
0 0 [Posted by: TAViX  | Date: 12/23/11 10:12:45 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Deneb 975 Quad core 3.6Ghz.
2 0 [Posted by: Reaver960  | Date: 12/23/11 11:25:26 AM]
Reply

6. 
This is not Fhenom II processors. This is are different engineering samples of Bulldoser cores! With my preview post I make a joke with yellow rumor in the article.
1 0 [Posted by: Anton Markov  | Date: 12/23/11 10:52:55 AM]
Reply

7. 
Damn and here i thought AMD came to its senses and shrunk the die and kept the Thuban design and added two more cores. I was getting excited until i saw it was based on BD with no L3 cache.
2 0 [Posted by: SteelCity1981  | Date: 12/23/11 03:25:43 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
just some more optimizations to thuban and it'll be great, who needs bulldozer cores (at least desktop users don't) after they saw it's performance
1 0 [Posted by: madooo12  | Date: 12/24/11 03:26:23 AM]
Reply

8. 
Stupid move; Phenom II / Thuban actually outperforms Bulldozer in terms of single thread performance, so with a die-shrink to 32nm and ISA extensions in store AMD should better add the 2 extra cores to crank up throughput without sacrificing overall performance. BD needs its bottlenecks to be ironed out first.
0 0 [Posted by: sanity  | Date: 12/23/11 05:48:24 PM]
Reply

9. 
i don't understand you people, if you want a supercomputer on your desk, just get a quad socket G34 and put 4 x 16core cpus in it.
I was going to go the C32 path but then bulldozer opteron were released with 8/6/4 module count
2 0 [Posted by: thefumigator  | Date: 12/23/11 08:17:10 PM]
Reply

10. 
Those are not the real Phenom x6 architecture .. its based on bulldozer so its fail. Now they gonna rape the name Phenom just like they did with the Athlon.
1 0 [Posted by: 3Dkiller  | Date: 12/24/11 05:22:49 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
you mean Phenom X8
0 1 [Posted by: madooo12  | Date: 12/24/11 09:10:00 AM]
Reply

11. 
Hey guys take it easy now, the new architecture is good, just not mature enough, they just rushed to make it available.

I believe the bulldozer can be a strong CPU, but not until another year or so.

It is better to improve the new technology that opens a lot of new ways to improve, than to just try to get more from a dieing (from old ages) technology.
2 0 [Posted by: nitro912gr  | Date: 12/24/11 11:14:52 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
a whole new open architecture (or improving one like solaris) is better, but still that isn't bad
1 0 [Posted by: madooo12  | Date: 12/24/11 01:24:11 PM]
Reply
 
Can you suggest any actual improvements that can be applied to the BLD micro-architecture to improve its performance radically (more than by 10%). Process technology switch and clock-speed improvement is now locked for AMD.
0 0 [Posted by: Anton  | Date: 12/25/11 08:56:10 AM]
Reply
 
yes IPC improvements (by using shorter pipelines) are great and die shrinks will improve frequencies, thermals and power usage
1 1 [Posted by: madooo12  | Date: 12/26/11 01:06:43 AM]
Reply
 
The best thing they could do is start cloning Intel chips again.
1 2 [Posted by: GreenChile  | Date: 12/26/11 07:08:43 PM]
Reply
 
yes to get 386 chips performance again due to lack of competition
and at the 22 nm process it's quite hard and time consuming
1 0 [Posted by: madooo12  | Date: 12/27/11 01:57:06 AM]
Reply
 
Yeah, hire you for their engineering team coffee machine boy in Texas.
0 2 [Posted by: bereft  | Date: 12/31/11 10:43:11 PM]
Reply

12. 
AMD STOP WHAT YOU ARE DOING AND LISTEN!!! NOBODY WANTS YOUR PHONY (and I use the term loosely) 8 CORE B.D. ARCHITECTURE CPUS! B.D. IS B.S.,they are not real 8 core processors, they only have 4 cores (2 separate dual core dies) and they don't even compete with your prior 45nm PhenomII CPUs. Why don't you just shrink your old PhenomII quad or 6 core CPUs to a 32nm die atleast then we would have 4 or 6 REAL CORES!!! And don't even try to claim it can't be done,I have been studying microprocessor engineering for the past 5 years, you are just trying to be cheap and scheme people into buying your bogus chips!!!
0 1 [Posted by: Kilobit  | Date: 01/16/12 03:33:29 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Your an Idiot right
"they are not real 8 core processors, they only have 4 cores (2 separate dual core dies)"

the 8 core BD is comprised of 4 dual core modules which consist of 2 x86 cores an 1 x87 core (shared) per module

so technically they do have 8 cores they just have only 4 x87 cores
0 0 [Posted by: Athlonite  | Date: 01/17/12 03:32:22 PM]
Reply
 
Each set of 2 cores shares part of the pipeline, instruction fetch and decode, so if either of those stall both cores may stall.
0 0 [Posted by: user99  | Date: 01/19/12 11:09:11 AM]
Reply

13. 
BullDozer or BullDust?
0 0 [Posted by: gmn17  | Date: 02/04/12 03:34:42 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
Not BullDust it's Bulldozer.
also Bulldozer is not so fast but Vishera ,Barca and Stream Roller are the fastest cores in the world in the 2013 and 2014 and AMD will create the new 20 nm sixteen core x64 processor until the next few years.
0 0 [Posted by: parham  | Date: 10/27/13 05:37:09 PM]
Reply

14. 
If you want an extremely fast computer with high clock,the AMD Phenom iv 12 core x12 170 barca @6GHz and AMD FX 9590 x8 vishera eight core @4.7GHz are the best choices.
0 0 [Posted by: parham  | Date: 10/27/13 05:17:59 PM]
Reply

15. 
If you want a real super fast computer the AMD Phenom iv 12 core x12 170 barca @6GHz and AMD FX 9590 8 core x8 vishera @ 4.7 GHz are the best choices.
0 0 [Posted by: parham  | Date: 10/27/13 05:21:16 PM]
Reply

16. 
Bulldozer is not good but vishera and barca are the best.
The new AM4 AMD phenom iv x12 170 barca processor has 12 real x64 cores running at 6 GHz and 24 Mega bytes of Level 3 and 12 x 512 Kilo bytes of Level 2 caches.
it is in the new AM4 socket and AM4 is faster than AM3+ and also everything is so brilliant when it uses only 75 Watts of TDP.
0 0 [Posted by: parham  | Date: 10/27/13 05:29:06 PM]
Reply

[1-16]

Back to the Article

Add your Comment