1.
I don't know about you, but I'm thinking for reasons that will just not be apparent till they happen, that AMD won't really be on time with this one. Like every delay of the past, they won't really get this into the market till 2006, and they won't tell you that till mid 2005.
If you think dual core is going to be a significant benefit to you, I'm thinking Intel is the only real one to deliver it in 2005. I'm sure not all will agree, but I see AMD being both late and, if they base the dual cores off 90nm, they will be very $$$ too. Intel won't be cheap, it'll just be cheapER.
I think this is a release, with no real ability to do it behind it.
Just imo :)
If you think dual core is going to be a significant benefit to you, I'm thinking Intel is the only real one to deliver it in 2005. I'm sure not all will agree, but I see AMD being both late and, if they base the dual cores off 90nm, they will be very $$$ too. Intel won't be cheap, it'll just be cheapER.
I think this is a release, with no real ability to do it behind it.
Just imo :)
[Posted by: Anemone | Date: 05/22/04 04:27:51 PM]





