<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[news_300]%>

News

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

These days nearly all developers of hardware constantly introduce new brand-names for nearly every single technology they implement in order to attract attention of potential clients. They brand data-transfer patterns, they call L2 cache with special names and some even brand their own processor’s buses so to show their own uniqueness.

AMD is not an exception from all the companies in this industry and also wants to attract massive attention and show that it is different from the others.  As we have managed to find out, AMD will introduce a special trademark for the Socket 940 intended for the Opteron processors. The company will brand the socket as “AMD Socket 940” showing that even if other companies, such as Intel, Sun, VIA or Transmeta decide to utilise processor packaging with 940 pins, there was no mess with different types of Sockets, since AMD Socket 940 is intended for AMD x86-64 chips only.

AMD Opteron x86-64 CPUs appear on the surface on the 22nd of April, that is on Tuesday, next week. Keep your eyes opened since there is plenty of interesting things coming your way before and after the mentioned date.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Related news

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_2]%>
Comments currently: 1
Discussion started: 04/19/03 01:35:45 AM
Latest comment: 04/19/03 01:35:53 AM

[1-1]

1. 
Stupid name. Why not socket B? Athlon have had such an advantage over the years by sticking to a single socket. I've swapped in and out a 900MHz Athlon, a 1GHz athlon, and now 2 1800+ Athlon XP's in my 2 PCs over the last 2 years, without needing a new motherboard. Socket A was a convenient name. In the meantime Intel went through I-dont-know-how-many sockets, forcing users to buy new motherboards. Keeping AMD to letters while Intel users are forced to remember many different numbers, would have kept things simple. Then Athlon64 could have had socket C (that would have caused problems, since B would have been faster than C).

[Posted by: will smith | Date: 04/19/03 01:35:52 AM]

[1-1]

You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Thursday, August 28, 2008

1:37 pm | AMD to Start Transition to New Platform Form-Factor in March, 2009. AMD to Ship First AM3 Processors in March, 2009

8:15 am | Rumours About Abit’s Exiting from Mainboard Business Resurrect. Abit to Stop Making Mainboards by Year End – Rumours

6:27 am | Nvidia Changes SLI Licensing Policy, Starts Mainboards Certification. Nvidia to Charge Mainboard Makers for SLI License

4:32 am | AMD’s First 45nm Desktop Microprocessors Set to Arrive on the 8th of January, 2009. AMD Phenom X4 45nm Expected to Hit Higher Clock-Speeds

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

11:54 pm | Fujitsu Preps “Venus” Eight-Core Sparc64 Processor. Sparc64 to Get Eight Processing Engines

4:26 pm | Qimonda Begins to Ship XDR Memory for Sony PlayStation 3. Qimonda Initiates XDR Shipments for Sony’s PlayStation 3

3:01 pm | One New Dual-Core AMD Athlon X2/K10 Processor Is Planned for September Launch, Say Sources. AMD Readies Athlon X2 6500, No Dual-Core Phenom Chips for Now

12:51 pm | Nvidia Does Not Plan to Develop Central Processing Units – Company. Nvidia Has No x86 CPU Ambitions, Says Co-Founder

9:34 am | Samsung Unveils Solid State Drives for Ultra Low-Cost Personal Computers. Samsung Bets on SSDs for Low-Cost Personal Computers