<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[news_300]%>

News

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

Intel and Microsoft spent quite a lot of time on implementing Hyper-Threading technology support in the Windows XP operating system. It has not eliminated possible bugs of the implementation, though. Last year there were a number of cases when the Hyper-Threading technology caused performance decrease rather than increase, and now Microsoft confirms there was in error in Hyper-Threading support by Windows XP SP1 Professional and Home Edition.

As Warp2Search web-site found out, a program that uses large mapped file views to share information between two processes may experience a significant performance decrease. The performance degradation occurs in the UnmapViewOfFile function. Problem occurs if you install Windows XP Service Pack 1 (SP1) on an Intel Pentium 4-based computer that has more than one logical processor (e.g. your CPU supports Hyper-Threading).

A supported fix is now available from Microsoft, but it is only intended to correct the problem that is described in this article. Apply it only to computers that are experiencing this specific problem. This fix may receive additional testing. Therefore, if you are not severely affected by this problem, Microsoft recommends that you wait for the next Windows XP service pack that contains this fix. Visit this page over Microsoft’s web-site for more information on the matter.

We have seen quite a significant performance increase in various applications when the Hyper-Threading was enabled, though, there are some applications which may suffer from performance loss. It does not mean you should avoid processors with Hyper-Threading, but it means you should try to make sure your software benefits from the Hyper-Threading. Even if Microsoft was unable to implement the technology in appropriate way, no one can guarantee that some other software makers will not make the same mistake.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_2]%>
Comments currently: 1
Discussion started: 06/16/03 04:18:52 PM
Latest comment: 06/16/03 04:18:52 PM

[1-1]

1. 
Nice article, but the ms link points you to ms support, not a patch. Is there a patch actually available for this idiotic bug?
[Posted by: Bob Walsh | Date: 06/16/03 04:18:52 PM]

[1-1]

You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Thursday, August 28, 2008

1:37 pm | AMD to Start Transition to New Platform Form-Factor in March, 2009. AMD to Ship First AM3 Processors in March, 2009

8:15 am | Rumours About Abit’s Exiting from Mainboard Business Resurrect. Abit to Stop Making Mainboards by Year End – Rumours

6:27 am | Nvidia Changes SLI Licensing Policy, Starts Mainboards Certification. Nvidia to Charge Mainboard Makers for SLI License

4:32 am | AMD’s First 45nm Desktop Microprocessors Set to Arrive on the 8th of January, 2009. AMD Phenom X4 45nm Expected to Hit Higher Clock-Speeds

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

11:54 pm | Fujitsu Preps “Venus” Eight-Core Sparc64 Processor. Sparc64 to Get Eight Processing Engines

4:26 pm | Qimonda Begins to Ship XDR Memory for Sony PlayStation 3. Qimonda Initiates XDR Shipments for Sony’s PlayStation 3

3:01 pm | One New Dual-Core AMD Athlon X2/K10 Processor Is Planned for September Launch, Say Sources. AMD Readies Athlon X2 6500, No Dual-Core Phenom Chips for Now

12:51 pm | Nvidia Does Not Plan to Develop Central Processing Units – Company. Nvidia Has No x86 CPU Ambitions, Says Co-Founder

9:34 am | Samsung Unveils Solid State Drives for Ultra Low-Cost Personal Computers. Samsung Bets on SSDs for Low-Cost Personal Computers