News

Intel and Microsoft spent quite a lot of time on implementing Hyper-Threading technology support in the Windows XP operating system. It has not eliminated possible bugs of the implementation, though. Last year there were a number of cases when the Hyper-Threading technology caused performance decrease rather than increase, and now Microsoft confirms there was in error in Hyper-Threading support by Windows XP SP1 Professional and Home Edition.

As Warp2Search web-site found out, a program that uses large mapped file views to share information between two processes may experience a significant performance decrease. The performance degradation occurs in the UnmapViewOfFile function. Problem occurs if you install Windows XP Service Pack 1 (SP1) on an Intel Pentium 4-based computer that has more than one logical processor (e.g. your CPU supports Hyper-Threading).

A supported fix is now available from Microsoft, but it is only intended to correct the problem that is described in this article. Apply it only to computers that are experiencing this specific problem. This fix may receive additional testing. Therefore, if you are not severely affected by this problem, Microsoft recommends that you wait for the next Windows XP service pack that contains this fix. Visit this page over Microsoft’s web-site for more information on the matter.

We have seen quite a significant performance increase in various applications when the Hyper-Threading was enabled, though, there are some applications which may suffer from performance loss. It does not mean you should avoid processors with Hyper-Threading, but it means you should try to make sure your software benefits from the Hyper-Threading. Even if Microsoft was unable to implement the technology in appropriate way, no one can guarantee that some other software makers will not make the same mistake.

Discussion

Comments currently: 1
Discussion started: 06/16/03 04:18:52 PM
Latest comment: 06/16/03 04:18:52 PM

[1-1]

1. 
Nice article, but the ms link points you to ms support, not a patch. Is there a patch actually available for this idiotic bug?
[Posted by: Bob Walsh  | Date: 06/16/03 04:18:52 PM]

[1-1]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

2:34 pm | Crucial Reveals 4GB DDR3 Memory Modules for Enthusiasts. Crucial Enables Desktops with 12GB, 24GB Memory

12:18 pm | AMD: Our Goal Is to Control 100% of AMD-Compatible Chipset Market. AMD Wants to Control Compatible Chipset Business

8:37 am | Intel to Demonstrate 48-Core Microprocessor. Intel’s Developers to Showcase "Cloud Computing-on-Chip"

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

11:26 pm | PNY and Sony to Add Free Movies to Flash Cards, Graphics Cards. PNY’s Flash Products, Graphics Cards to Be Bundled with Free Movies

6:35 pm | Samsung Begins to Mass Produce NAND Flash with DDR Interface. Samsung’s New NAND Flash Boasts Improved Data Read Speed, Same Power Consumption

6:04 pm | Kingston Reportedly to Outsource Part of Production. Kingston to Outsource Production to Gain Market Share

3:14 pm | Universal Studios to Release Universal Blu-Ray/DVD Media. Universal Finally Puts Blu-Ray and DVD onto the Same Media

11:47 am | Samsung Begins to Produce 3-Bit-per-Cell Flash Memory Using 30nm Process Tech. Samsung Makes 3-Bit-per-Cell Flash at 30nm Node