News

According to the most-recent top-secret roadmaps of Sunnyvale, California-based Advanced Micro Devices, the cost-effective versions of AMD Athlon 64 processors known under code-names “Paris” and “Victoria” will be made in Socket 754 form-factors and will not be able to work in 64-bit mode as the higher-end Athlon 64 CPUs.

In order to replace the current Socket A platforms and force migration to the newer Socket 754 mainboards, AMD will make improved microprocessors that will be based on Athlon 64 architecture, but will be branded as “AMD Athlon XP” and will not be able to run advanced 64-bit applications for x86-64 architecture. Among advantages of the more powerful Athlon XP microprocessors, we should mention integrated single-channel PC3200 memory controller as well as SSE2 technology in addition to the improved architecture in general. Expect the Athlon XP microprocessors to perform better than current processors at the same speeds.

Paris” is expected to have 256KB of L2 cache, whereas the size of L2 of the code-named “Victoria” processor produced using 90nm technology is not known. It is interesting to note that the Paris will be available only in the second or the third quarter of 2004, hence, it seems to be too early to make predictions in regards availability of its 90nm brethren.

Provided that the rumoured information above is correct and AMD’s plans do not change, a year from now there will still be a bunch of 32-bit only CPUs from AMD. This means that software developers will not be very interested in optimizing their products for higher-end AMD 64-bit CPUs earlier than in 2005 or even later timeframe. This means that AMD may loose one of its very important advantages in case there are more 32-bit only processors than 32-/64-bit chips in the market.

Discussion

Comments currently: 8
Discussion started: 08/21/03 09:57:18 AM
Latest comment: 01/17/06 10:36:02 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-7]

1. 
"Provided that the rumoured information above is correct and AMD’s plans do not change, a year from now there will still be a bunch of 32-bit only CPUs from AMD. This means that software developers will not be very interested in optimizing their products for higher-end AMD 64-bit CPUs earlier than in 2005 or even later timeframe. This means that AMD may loose one of its very important advantages in case there are more 32-bit only processors than 32-/64-bit chips in the market."

If there is demand for cheep 32-bit CPUs AMD will supply for that demand. Plus users who buy a 754-pin AthlonXP will be able to upgrade to a 754-pin Athlon64. Intel has 80% of the desktop marke, if developers port to x86-64 they arn't going to do it because 20% of the market is capable of 64-bit. And actually it comes back to supply and demand if people demand 64-bit software, then it will be supplied by the developers. It comes down to money, not that AMD is still selling 32-bit CPUs.
[Posted by: supply_and_demand  | Date: 08/21/03 09:57:18 AM]

2. 
Now that you have been proven wrong, will you please do a retraction?
[Posted by: lilricky  | Date: 08/22/03 12:37:07 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

3. 
The Athlon is being ramped up, not the Athlon 64 being ramped down. Sheesh read the roadmap again.
[Posted by: lilricky  | Date: 08/22/03 12:39:03 AM]

4. 
It would be interesting if they made a Athlon64 (single-channel) 754pin into a dual-channel system. This would put a memory controler on the north bridge that communicates with the CPU over the Hyper-transport front side bus. Cheaper chip, slighlty more expensive motherboard, more performance (DDR- or DDRII PC3200+ non-ECC SDRAM) ?
[Posted by: tygrus  | Date: 08/23/03 09:04:27 PM]

5. 
Personally I think its a smart move for AMD because it puts all of there processors on a common platform, making it easier for consumers to actually upgrade to a 64-bit proc later on down the road. As long as they keep the two lines compatible, they should increase the want and demand, for their 64-bit processor. Unlike Intel who does not have an x86-64 processor on the market at this time, and has to have a completely different setup for their 64-bit processor, making it more expensive for consumers, and less likely for a consumer to do the upgrade.
[Posted by: Insurgence  | Date: 08/25/03 02:10:33 AM]

6. 
Could be a winner if they let you enable mixed-32/64 bit mode. Like the 80386sx
[Posted by: qts  | Date: 08/25/03 03:16:30 AM]

7. 
i have a Athlon 64 3300+ Real Code Name Paris Core, Aka Newcastle now, but its everything the 3100+ is except 64 an sse 3 disabled, everything else is all the same, you know about this Paris Core 3300+ i got some screen shots u may wanna see, email me back @ inursadmachines@gmail.com
[Posted by: paul  | Date: 01/17/06 10:36:02 PM]

[1-7]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS