We now can confirm that AMD Athlon 64 FX processor based on 90nm San Diego core with Socket 939 form-factor will be launched next year, but will not be pin-to-pin compatible with existing mainboards, as The Inquirer told you earlier.
The new Athlon 64 FX microprocessor with dual-channel memory support is not likely to require expensive registered DIMM modules and hence will be more popular among end users. A problem with it is that it will not be compatible with existing Socket 940 mainboards since the design guide for the part will be available only in October. Looks like AMD goes Intel steps and forces some of its customers to play “change your mainboard game” next year.
Small quantities of the AMD Athlon 64 FX “San Diego” microprocessors made using 90nm fabrication technology in either AMD Fab30 in Dresden, Germany, or in IBM’s East Fishkill facility, will be available at the end of the first quarter next year, whereas massive quantities are expected to hit the market in the second quarter. Their core-clocks are very likely to be 2.60GHz or beyond to beat Intel’s Prescott processors at 3.60 – 3.80GHz that also have 1MB of L2 cache.
There is no information about the branding of San Diego code-named chips, but I would expect them to use the same branding method that will be found on this year’s AMD Athlon 64 FX processors with dual-channel memory controllers.
Comments currently:
7
Discussion started: 08/23/03 02:09:50 AM
Latest comment: 11/22/05 09:18:08 AM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-6]
1.
For Christ sake, that is old news just repacked in your own words!
AMD roadmap is publicli available for a long time, an The Inquirer writes about Athlon64 every day!
Now you're taking the same step 'cos mentionig Athlon 64 bring people to click on your link!
Same thing goes for R(V)360!
A XBL that I used to know is long gone! Whatta shame!
You're usedt to be first with brand new happenings in the hardware industri, now I can read about new Durons i a dozent other places! But it's important that you recicelin an old news for a tousend times over and over! Anna should write news once again!
Greating from your slovenian "brother"!
P.S
That FUD about 90nano A64 being only 32bit (but still not having any internal register changes in comparation with clawhammer) just makes me sad, real sad! It's like buther writing news, not someone who realy knowss what's going on out thewrw in IT market!
[
Posted by: beholder

|
Date: 08/23/03 02:09:50 AM]
2.
So who thinks AMD will make it to .09 by end of Q104. I remember when there was all that talk about AMD paying IBM a ton of money becuase they were having trouble with SOI. Everyone thought IBM was helping them with the .13 process, but The Inquire reported some time ago that IBM was actually helping them out with the .09 process. So AMD may be set to go.
[
Posted by: jello

|
Date: 08/23/03 10:31:00 PM]
3.
The new Athlon 64 may performs well today but still the Pentium 4 Extreme Edition can keep up with its performance, how much more when Intel will launch its new Pentium Processor next year? Can AMD keep with its performance?....I DON'T THINK SO, because as much as everybody is concern. INTEL is the BEST Microprocessor avilable.
[
Posted by: Bond

|
Date: 10/05/03 07:25:47 PM]
4.
You seem to be forgeting something. P4 EE isn't out yet!! Prescott is rumoured to have 103w of heat. Far more than any AMD chip. You Intel fanboys need to get a life. Consumers should buy the best product available and not support one company over another just because of their name.
[
Posted by: gdizzle

|
Date: 10/05/03 09:51:45 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
This is hardly a place for discussion over which brand of microprocessor is better, each has its benefits and drawbacks, currently, the AMD64 based chips seem to be steadily out running anything comparable by Inte, save for the extreme edition chips, but even they do fun faster, its by about 4 fps, an they cost almost 4 times as muchl. But as the microprocessor industry goes, things could change drastically in a matter of weeks. Prescoot currently sucks due to a longer pipline but lack of a high enough clock speed to use it effecitively, whereas the AMD's are having memory issues as well as second-rate chipsets seem to hold them back some too. I'm still wanting to see benchmarks of the AMD64's in its 64-bit enviroment, I will say though that intergrating a memory controller into the core was a very impressive move on AMD's part.
[
Posted by: N/A

|
Date: 02/29/04 03:04:46 PM]
5.
I think that AMD CPU is MORE better than Pentium. It uses less electricity, and the real frequency of AMD does much more than the real frequency of a Pentium. E.g. the Atlon XP 2400+ has 2000 MHz, and it's better, than the P4 2300. I think that AMD will improve its technology and it will be more powerful than Pentium.
[
Posted by: L3Wy

|
Date: 11/22/05 09:15:34 AM]
6.
AMD is BETTER.
[
Posted by: L3Wy

|
Date: 11/22/05 09:18:08 AM]
[1-6]