News

Advanced Micro Devices announced today that it plans to offer its customers AMD Opteron processors with lowered power consumption in the first half of 2004. The chips will be intended for variety of platforms, including 1-way, 2-way and 4-/8-way applications.

The Sunnyvale, California-based firm will offer both mid-power and low-power Opteron CPUs consuming 55W and 30W of energy respectively. There is no clue about the core speed of the microprocessors, but the idea of AMD64 processors for server and mission-critical applications may be quite interesting and practically accomplishable. As we know, later this year AMD launches Mobile Athlon 64 chips for notebooks. The parts are expected to consume less power than desktop versions of Athlon 64 CPUs, thus, the company has a number of ways to reduce the consumption of its chips even now.

Currently AMD Opteron processors’ total thermal power is about 84.7W, including CPU itself and built-in memory controller.

It is necessary to point out that the market of CPUs with lowered power consumption is expanding substantially nowadays. Enterprise computing systems that require power conservation, such as blade servers and storage devices, are gaining in popularity due to their scalability, ease of management and cost efficiency. In addition, mid- and low-power processors are a requirement for many server systems housed in large computing centers where power consumption and heat affects operating costs.

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 09/16/03 09:22:08 AM
Latest comment: 09/16/03 04:51:14 PM

[1-2]

1. 
Intel low voltage 1U Xeons don't work in your typical Intel server board. You have to get a server board designed for the 1U low-voltage CPU's. You'd think they'd make them all compatible... then again it is Intel.
[Posted by: The Jedi  | Date: 09/16/03 09:22:08 AM]

2. 
I retract my complaint above. They were the same speed and voltage of Xeon's, 1.5v, but different S-Spec. Maybe the CPUs are binned differently for 1U servers? The problem was more likely incompatible RAM rather than the wrong CPU. Sorry, I just got all facts today.
[Posted by: The Jedi  | Date: 09/16/03 04:51:14 PM]

[1-2]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS