News

We reported last week about astonishingly high pricing of today’s top CPUs from Intel and AMD aimed at gamers and enthusiasts. Even though PC history saw milestone chips, such as 1000MHz or 100MHz, quoted even higher, the situation now is a bit different: both Pentium 4 Extreme Edition as well as Athlon 64 FX-51 are not milestones – they are just a couple of overpriced microprocessors. In this case it is interesting to note the rumoured final price of Intel’s Extreme Edition CPU: $925 in 1000 units quantities, according to DigiTimes.

Intel Pentium 4 processor Extreme Edition is based on the core intended for servers and known under Gallatin code-name. The desktop processor does not support SMP and is fully compatible with existing Socket 478 infrastructure and 800MHz Quad Pumped Bus. With 3.20GHz core-clock, 512KB of L2 cache and 2MB of L3 cache, the Pentium 4 Extreme Edition provides an alternative to AMD’s high-end Athlon 64 processors with 1MB of L2 cache.

In case the unofficial report is correct and the chip is to be priced at $925 in quantities starting from 1000 units, its retail pricing will be about $1000, even higher than we originally suggested.

The staggering price of Intel’s top-edge desktop chip mirrors the company’s plan to offer the Extreme Edition product to the customers that desire extreme performance at any possible price. As we noted already, the market of hardware enthusiasts has been growing and it becomes very lucrative to serve its needs. As a result, both Intel and AMD may in future continue offering such Extreme devices to advanced end-users.

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 10/09/03 02:46:51 PM
Latest comment: 10/09/03 03:19:47 PM

[1-3]

1. 
With a price like that, you might as well call it "Xeon DE" (Desktop Edition)

This is a "knee jerk" response from Intel...
[Posted by: 22  | Date: 10/09/03 02:46:51 PM]

2. 
Sure a pity they didn't do it right and go with 2 Mb of L1 like AMD. Imagine a P4 3.5 Ghz chip with 1000 FSB and 4 Gb of GOOD DDR500!
[Posted by: Wizwill  | Date: 10/09/03 03:06:09 PM]

3. 
I wouldn't want to. It'll be a pain in the butt just to cool the thing to my liking.

I never liked the P4 architecture in the first place. There is no P4-based system in my house. (All PIII, Pentium-M, Athlon MPs, etc)
Because I require raw number crunching in the stuff I do.

BTW, last time I check, AMD chips (64bit ones) are 1MB L2 Cache.

[Posted by: butterball  | Date: 10/09/03 03:19:47 PM]

[1-3]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS