News

Attention! We are testing our new system for creating tables. With the aim of improving efficiency of our work and time we are going to use the same kind of presentation in future as well. Please make your suggestions to X-bit labs in “Comments” section.

Both leading CPU makers yesterday cut down the pricing of their microprocessors. Intel’s price reduction was expected to happen since Spring, while AMD’s decision to reconsider the pricing of its Athlon and Opteron processors became known only last week, even though we could expect it to happen, as the Sunnyvale, California-based company always follows Intel with price-slashes.



Please click to enlarge.

AMD cut the pricing of its Athlon XP chips by 6% to 30%, while Intel reduced the pricing of its high-end chips by 21% to 34.5%. Both companies are preparing for the home-stretch of the year – the Christmas sales season – and aggressive price drops are necessary to boost the demand for PCs powered by either Pentium or Athlon processors.


Please click to enlarge.

Sales of servers do not really require a boost during Christmas season, as they probably go quite well. At least, now it looks like Intel is more confident in its server platforms than AMD, who has to drop the prices on its high-end Opteron CPUs by up to 40%. This may be an alarming sign, as earlier some AMD sources indicated rock stability in Opteron pricing.

Worth to note that AMD Opteron processors 100 series designed for 1-way servers and workstations also lost in value quite significantly.


Please click to enlarge.

Mobile computers are also expected to sell well later this year, both AMD and Intel are reducing prices of their chips for portable devices. Since Intel promised to decrease the pricing on some of its chips for desktop-replacement notebooks earlier this year, there are no shocks that the company cut the values of Mobile Pentium 4 CPUs by up to 33% yesterday.

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 10/28/03 06:24:32 PM
Latest comment: 10/30/03 01:44:53 AM

[1-3]

1. 
The last table image links to the wrong table. The mini view shows mobile CPU's, but the enlarge view shows server CPU's.
[Posted by: Mark  | Date: 10/28/03 06:24:32 PM]

2. 
http://www.xbitlabs.com/misc/picture/?src=/images/news/2003- 10/cpu_price_mobile_28102003.gif&1=1
[Posted by: asdf  | Date: 10/29/03 11:56:43 AM]

3. 
table is just too small to read as it is and just too big to fit on one page without scrolling from side to side.


mark
[Posted by: mas  | Date: 10/30/03 01:44:53 AM]

[1-3]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Friday, July 3, 2009

5:50 pm | Apple Reminds: iPhone and iPod Overheat at 35 Degrees Celcius. Apple Issues Warning Concerning Overheating

1:09 pm | Former Intel’s Chief Does Not Expect Quick Results from Intel-Nokia Pact. Feasibility of Intel’s and Nokia’s Partnership to Be Clear in Several Years

9:15 am | Nvidia's Chief Executive Publicly Unveils Pricing of "Ion" Core-Logic. Nvidia’s Ion Platform Appears to Be Up to Three Times More Expensive than Intel’s

Thursday, July 2, 2009

11:42 pm | Transcend Equips Memory Modules with Thermal Sensors. Transcend's New Memory Modules Can Monitor Their Temperature

10:17 pm | AMD Will Not Support Nvidia's CUDA Technology. AMD Not Interested in Supporting Nvidia's CUDA

3:46 pm | Sony Claims that UMD-Less PlayStation Portable Was Always In The Plans. Sony's Claims Raises Question Whether UMD Ever Was a Compulsory Element of PSP

12:43 pm | DDR3 to Capture 30% of the Market by Year End - DRAMeXchange. Contract DDR3 Prices to Increase in July