Information

X-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news.

CPU

AMD Athlon 64 Technology Becomes More Affordable!

Get It Now!

Category: CPU

by Anton Shilov

[ 12/15/2003 | 03:03 PM ]

In order to offer a broad range of 64-bit central processing units to cover mainstream, performance-mainstream and high-end desktop segments with AMD64 offerings, Advanced Micro Devices today quietly rolls out its new AMD Athlon 64 3000+ processor at a substantially lower price-point than any other 64-bit CPUs available today.

<%BANNER[article_nw]%>

The new AMD Athlon 64 chip with 3000+ model number is available for orders now at $218 for quantities starting from 1000 units. Any technical details about the SKU are absent at the moment, just like the press release about the launch. The only thing AMD did was including of the processor’s price and brand-name in the company’s official pricelist.

The unveiling of the chip was not a surprise, however. On Sunday X-bit labs reported about the AMD Athlon 64 3000+ CPUs for sale all around the world. The AMD Athlon 64 3000+ processors available immediately run at 2.00GHz, the same speed as the higher-end Athlon 64 3200+ chip. But the less expensive CPU incorporates only 512KB of level-two cache – only a half of 1MB L2 cache provided by the Athlon 64 3200+. Both AMD64microprocessors incorporate 128KB of L1 cache and one Hyper-Transport link with aggregate bandwidth of 6.40GB/s to communicate with PC I/O. The new 3000+ 64-bit processor builds-in single-channel PC3200 controller.

AMD is also shipping Athlon 64 3000+ chip for desktop replacement notebooks running at 1.80GHz and packing 1MB of L2 cache. The SKU is also quoted at $218 for AMD customers. On the other hand, sources close to AMD recently unleashed the company's intention to ship desktop chips with 512KB of cache, but, presumably, with speeds above 2.00GHz.

64-bit microprocessors priced in $200 range may become rather popular among end-users who are looking for some new and exciting hardware, but cannot easily afford a $400 or $700 CPUs, such as the Athlon 64 3200+ or Athlon 64 FX-51. System integrators should also be happy with the new flavour of AMD64, as their customers may bite those more reasonably priced 64-bit systems.

Officials from Sunnyvale, California-based AMD were not instantionally available for comment.

Related news

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 12/15/03
View comments

Add your Comment

Name/Nickname
Your Comments
 

News Archive

CPU

December, 2003
 
1
2
345
6
7
8
910
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
   
 
< November, 2003 January, 2004 >
 

Latest News

Friday, July 25, 2008

12:31 pm | Video Channel Vendors Demand Graphics Cards Suppliers to Recall Potentially Faulty Nvidia GeForce Graphics Cards. Resellers Want to Return Potentially Faulty Nvidia GeForce Graphics Boards to Makers

9:00 am | Other AMD Denies Manufacturing Operations Spin Off Plan. AMD: Only Real Men Have Fabs

Thursday, July 24, 2008

11:59 pm | Other HP Set to Make Voodoo-Branded Systems Available Worldwide. HP’s Voodoo Computers to Be Available Through HP Sales Network

11:06 pm | CPU Intel Rumoured to Speed Up Nehalem Launch on Desktop. Intel’s Bloomfield Processor to Emerge in September – Rumours

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

9:58 pm | Storage Western Digital Releases VelociRaptor for Enterprises. WD Launches Enterprise Version of VelociRaptor

5:42 pm | Multimedia Game Developers Unlikely to Take Advantage of Improved Nintendo Wii Controller Soon. Nintendo Wii MotionPlus – A Surprise for Game Developers

4:26 pm | Memory Hynix Semiconductor to Shut Down Fab in the U.S. Hynix Semiconductor to Close its Eugene Fabrication Facility

3:35 pm | CPU AMD to Discuss Rival for Intel Atom Towards Year End. AMD’s Competitor for Intel Atom in the Works, Says Company

12:29 pm | Storage SanDisk Blames Windows Vista for Low Performance of Solid State Drives. SanDisk: Vista Is Not Optimized for Flash Memory Solid State Disk

 
News Archive