News

Advanced Micro Devices is rumored to deliver very few desktop AMD Athlon 64 microprocessors in its new 939-pin packaging in the second and the third quarters of the year, but is expected to ramp up the volume of its chips for Socket 754 platforms.

Sunnyvale, California-based AMD is expected to unveil its new Socket 939 platform and processors in PGA939 packaging on the 25th of May, 2004, after several setbacks. However, despite of optimistic predictions, availability of such microprocessors will be very limited initially. Currently some sources familiar with AMD’s plans estimate that there are going to be only a little bit more than 50 thousand of 939-pin AMD Athlon 64 and AMD Athlon 64 FX processors available in the second quarter of the year, amid 700 thousand of units in PGA754 packaging shipping during the same quarter.

AMD Athlon 64 processors with 939 pins will integrate 512KB of L2, only a half of the size incorporated into today’s 754-pin chips, but will benefit from very efficient dual-channel memory controller that is likely to decrease the impact of cut-down cache and even improve performance of 939-pin chips over 754-pin processors with 1MB on-die secondary-level cache, which is why CPUs in different types of packaging will not have similar model numbers at equal clock-speeds. The AMD Athlon 64 FX parts will continue to have 1MB of L2 after the transition to Socket 939.

The situation with availability of new microprocessors in 939-pin packaging is going to improve in the third quarter of the year when AMD is hinted to supply roughly 260 thousand of such chips. At the same time, the Sunnyvale, California-based microprocessor maker is expected continue ramping up production of AMD Athlon 64 in 754-pin packaging to 970 thousand of units. In the fourth quarter of the year the company is projected to ship 540 thousand and 900 thousand of AMD64 central processors for Socket 939 and Socket 754 platforms respectively.

According to existing estimates, only in the Q1 2005 the output of more advanced Athlon 64 processors will tangibly outstrip that of the AMD Athlon 64 chips with single-channel memory controller. Sources suggest 1.20 million of PGA939 and 250 thousand PGA754 processors from AMD to ship during the mentioned timeframe.

Predictions of sources close to the company contributing their details for the story are significantly lower than anticipations of AMD in terms of AMD64 product shipments. The world’s No.2 microprocessor designer said it would deliver 1 million of 64-bit processors already in Q1 2004, while the source suggested that there would be only 755 thousand of desktop AMD64 chips available in Q2 2004.

Advanced Micro Devices said its first commercial 90nm microprocessors will show up in “Septermber-October-November” timeframe. The majority of desktop AMD64 processors at 90nm nodes are projected to have dual-channel memory controller.

Officials for AMD did not comment on the story.

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 03/24/04 08:57:21 PM
Latest comment: 03/25/04 10:08:37 PM

[1-4]

1. 
I hate it. I am told everywhere to wait for socket 939. I am begining to think that Duke Nukem Forever is going to hit the shelves faster than this chip.
[Posted by: oroblraM  | Date: 03/24/04 08:57:21 PM]

2. 
1. AMD did not say 1M desktop A64s in Q1. AMD said they would hit about 1M TOTAL AMD64 parts (desktop, server (Opteron), mobile) in either Q1 OR Q2.

2. The Q4 04 and Q1 05 numbers cannot be correct. There is no reason to ramp that slowly, and certainly no reason to *plan* to ramp that slowly. These numbers may represent the "whitebox" supply... probably missing the large OEM numbers.
[Posted by: fred  | Date: 03/24/04 10:25:26 PM]

3. 
Well after Intel's latest I hope this doesn't take too long :)

My next system is focused on an FX-55 and an Nforce 3 PCI-e enabled chipset both of which I'll have to wait on to get. But after 3 Intel based machines its time for a change for the better.

Now hurry the engineers up please :)
[Posted by: Anemone  | Date: 03/25/04 06:48:15 PM]

4. 
Limited resources $$$ can limit how quickly a company can bring a product to market. You need money to make money.
AMD will pace themselves to get the most out of each release and keep MHz in reserve and ASP high. I'm sure AMD would have liked a bit more progress and a 64bit Microsoft OS. Intel are a bit more flexible and tend to have the money to quickly recover from mistakes and delays (& PR $$$).
AMD need to get pumping: faster CPU's and move more CPU's out the door. Would a few $Million would help Microsoft and developers to adopt AMD64 faster. They need more R&D to get ahead and stay ahead of Intel. It's more of a gamble they needed to do 12 months ago to be further ahead now.
[Posted by: tygrus  | Date: 03/25/04 10:08:37 PM]

[1-4]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Friday, July 3, 2009

5:50 pm | Apple Reminds: iPhone and iPod Overheat at 35 Degrees Celcius. Apple Issues Warning Concerning Overheating

1:09 pm | Former Intel’s Chief Does Not Expect Quick Results from Intel-Nokia Pact. Feasibility of Intel’s and Nokia’s Partnership to Be Clear in Several Years

9:15 am | Nvidia's Chief Executive Publicly Unveils Pricing of "Ion" Core-Logic. Nvidia’s Ion Platform Appears to Be Up to Three Times More Expensive than Intel’s

Thursday, July 2, 2009

11:42 pm | Transcend Equips Memory Modules with Thermal Sensors. Transcend's New Memory Modules Can Monitor Their Temperature

10:17 pm | AMD Will Not Support Nvidia's CUDA Technology. AMD Not Interested in Supporting Nvidia's CUDA

3:46 pm | Sony Claims that UMD-Less PlayStation Portable Was Always In The Plans. Sony's Claims Raises Question Whether UMD Ever Was a Compulsory Element of PSP

12:43 pm | DDR3 to Capture 30% of the Market by Year End - DRAMeXchange. Contract DDR3 Prices to Increase in July