Search<%BANNER[news_130_l]%>
<%BANNER[mem130]%>
InformationX-bit Labs for mobile users! Do not forget that we are running a special version of X-bit Labs web-site for users of mobile and handheld devices: http://pda.xbitlabs.com. Check out our news and articles from smartphones and PDAs to be always updated on the latest computer and technology news. <%BANNER[left_130x130_2]%>
<%BANNER[right_130x600]%>
|
<%BANNER[top_768x90]%> |
|
<%BANNER[banner_468x60]%>
CPUIntel’s Partners Worried About New Pentium 4 Supplies.Dell, HP, Cannot Get Enough Prescott, Extreme Edition ChipsCategory: CPU by Anton Shilov [ 04/15/2004 | 12:45 PM ]
Intel Corporation promised that 90nm ramp will be the fastest in the company’s history, but now it looks like the firm was overoptimistic, as two of its largest customers are switching back to 130nm desktop processors in an attempt to sustain volumes of their shipments.
A report over News.com claims that Dell and HP stopped to offer Pentium 4 E processors made using 90nm process technology as well as Pentium 4 Extreme Edition chips at 3.40GHz recently. The companies’ representatives are reported to have blamed insufficient supplies of such chips and consequential inability to serve their customers in timely manner. As a solution, both firms switched to 3.40GHz Pentium 4 processors based on Northwood core that is manufactured using 130nm technology. The Intel Pentium 4 E processors launched in early February 2004 have a lot of architectural tweaks and improvements, such as 16KB L1 data cache, 1MB L2 cache as well as improved branch predictor, faster instruction execution a better data pre-fetcher as well as 13 new instructions called SSE3. The main drawback of the According to Intel’s president Paul Otellini, the Santa Clara, California-based chipmaker expected to ship around 70 million of its new Insufficient supplies may either indicate unbelievable demand or problems with manufacturing the processors in sufficient quantities. Keeping in mind that in the past Intel confirmed issues with 90nm process technology, it is logical to look in this direction when thinking about the reason for insufficient supply. Even though Extreme Edition processors are made with 130nm process technology, the core of those products – Gallatin – was originally intended for MP servers, where 3.40GHz clock-speed is not required and is not available, which imply possible difficulties with production of such chips. It is not the first time Intel has chip shortages. In the most recent history the company could not supply 0.18 micron Pentium III speed-bins in 1999 and certain Pentium 4 processors in 2001. Such situation usually opens the doors to arch-rival AMD, who now have a strong advantage in the performance-mainstream and high-end market segments with its 64-bit processors that are faster compared to Intel’s Pentium 4 in loads of 32-bit benchmarks. Standing in front of the problems with delivering enough high-end processors, Intel is likely to badly need something to offer its clients in order not to lose the lucrative segment of high-end PCs. Unfortunately for the company, the trump of its Pentium 4 processors – ability to operate at high core-clocks – is facing the physics-related issues. AMD, who decided to rely on architecture, not just pure frequency, with its AMD64 processors is not reported to have problems with delivering sufficient numbers of its highest-end processors. Related news
<%BANNER[banner_468x30]%>
|
News Categories<%BANNER[right_130x130_1]%>
Latest NewsWednesday, July 23, 20089:58 pm | Storage Western Digital Releases VelociRaptor for Enterprises. WD Launches Enterprise Version of VelociRaptor 5:42 pm | Multimedia Game Developers Unlikely to Take Advantage of Improved Nintendo Wii Controller Soon. Nintendo Wii MotionPlus – A Surprise for Game Developers 4:26 pm | Memory Hynix Semiconductor to Shut Down Fab in the U.S. Hynix Semiconductor to Close its Eugene Fabrication Facility 3:35 pm | CPU AMD to Discuss Rival for Intel Atom Towards Year End. AMD’s Competitor for Intel Atom in the Works, Says Company 12:29 pm | Storage SanDisk Blames Windows Vista for Low Performance of Solid State Drives. SanDisk: Vista Is Not Optimized for Flash Memory Solid State Disk |
|