News

As expected, Intel Corporation, the world’s No. 1 chipmaker, on Tuesday added a new Intel Xeon processor-based platform with Intel Extended Memory 64 Technology (EM64T) and reduced power consumption aimed at the storage industry.

“Intel introduced the 64 bit-capable Low Voltage Intel Xeon processor 2.80GHz with 800 MHz system bus, which is aimed specifically at storage applications, such as controllers for storage networks. The new processor features Intel EM64T to extend memory addressability of storage systems beyond 4GB that eliminates performance penalties associated with large storage applications, such as data base programs,” Intel said in its statement.

The new processor also possesses nearly a 50% reduction in energy consumption compared to the non-power-optimized version to mitigate heat-related issues, Intel said, however, it did not specify any precise numbers of the new Intel LV Xeon’s thermal design power. Typical Intel Xeon processors made using 90nm process technology clocked at 2.80GHz – 3.0GHz clock-speed consume about 103W.

The new low-voltage Xeon processor is compatible with 2-way Socket 604 Intel E7520 infrastructure that sports DDR2 400MHz memory and PCI Express interconnect technology, may provides a high-performance platform suited to typically confined, heat sensitive NAS and SAN environments.

“The performance price being paid for the 4GB barrier today is particularly onerous for the storage industry. Extending the capabilities of EM64T to the storage arena will benefit the growing number of storage applications, such as a large database programs. This translates into better overall system performance end-users” said Mike Wall, general manager of the Intel Storage Components Division.

Intel’s previous generation LV Intel Xeon processors worked at 1.60GHz, 2.0GHz and 2.40GHz clock-speeds and used 400MHz Quad Pumped Bus to connect the rest of the system. Intel LV Xeon 1.60GHz chip features core voltage of 1.3V and thermal design power of about 30W. While new – Intel LV Xeon processor 2.80GHz with 1MB cache, EM64T and 800MHz processor system bus – central processing unit brings additional performance and 64-bit capability, it also consumes more energy than predecessors. For 1-way low-power applications Intel also supplies certain versions of the mobile Intel Pentium M CPU.

Intel’s arch-rival AMD also supplies low-power AMD Opteron chips for various markets. AMD’s chips consume 30W or 50W depending on the target market of the product.

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 10/26/04 08:11:54 PM
Latest comment: 10/27/04 12:49:04 AM

[1-3]

1. 
If they could make low voltage prescotts, that would be really good...those chips would be good for dual cores
[Posted by: Duke3d87  | Date: 10/26/04 08:11:54 PM]

2. 
Man, Intel sure is enjoying this 64 bit extentions they stole from amd.
[Posted by: zegermans  | Date: 10/26/04 10:37:21 PM]

3. 
(1) Intel have been making LV and Ultra LV (or ULV) CPUs for ages. Search for PIII ULVs in embedded industrial applications.

The problem is, you can't mass produce LV models like regular voltage CPUs. LV and ULV CPUs undergo stricter selection process. These are hand picked CPUs that can handle low voltage at similar mainstream CPU speeds.

So you make millions of CPUs, and you test them all, you find the ones that are suitable for different markets...LV, ULV, less cache (budget CPUs), etc. The process is commonly referred to as "speedbinning". Because you sort the CPUs into "bins". (One for budget CPUs, one for LV, one for ULV, etc, etc).

I've already mentioned that they'll use them in dual-core in 2005, as will AMD with their LV versions of Opterons. But the problem with dual-core Prescotts is the available bandwidth both cores must share. If you want to see this bottleneck gone, you'd have to wait for the 2nd generation Intel dual-core CPU.

The dual-core Xeons will be a refined version of the dual-core Prescott. They will also feature that thermal "load balancing" idea. CPU usage is tasked evenly to distribute the thermal dissipation in a balanced manner. (The technology is already used in dual-core Pentium-M prototypes).

(2) They didn't steal anything. In fact, its not even EXACTLY the same implementation! Some of EMT64's functions are done in software emulation. It'll be slightly slower under some scenarios.

If they stole it, implementation would be identical. And they're not. They are functionally the same, but their implementation is very different. So, zegermans, your statement is just plain WRONG.

The fact is, they downloaded the freely available AMD documents (which you can also download, they're in PDF format), on AMD64 and did what they can to emulate all of AMD64's functions. The result is EMT64. An implementation that is functionally the same, but how its done is different.
[Posted by: 22  | Date: 10/27/04 12:49:04 AM]

[1-3]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS