Intel Corp. on Thursday during a meeting with financial analysts confirmed intention to launch microprocessors code-named Merom and Conroe for notebooks and desktops. The firm called the chips “second generation dual-core processors”, which may indicate new architecture of the chips.
Intel’s president and COO, who will soon become the CEO of the world’s largest chipmaker, said Intel would launch “second generation dual-core processors” Merom, which would succeed Yonah, and Conroe, which would succeed Presler, in late 2006. He did not elaborate whether the company would ship the chips for revenue late next year, or Intel would launch the chips in late 2006.

Intel’s Presler processor is expected to be NetBurst-based chip with two processing engines respectively. It is projected that the chip is a derivative of Smithfield central processing units produced using 65nm process technology with minimal architectural changes. The Conroe was originally claimed to be a desktop flavour of Intel’s code-named Merom central processing unit (CPU) intended for mobile applications and featuring appropriate aggressive power saving capabilities.
Intel Merom processor itself reportedly is not a yet another Banias-like architecture, like Dothan and Yonah, but, as some sources proclaimed, “completely revamped” dual-core product also intended for mobile computers with relatively low power consumption, but still with rather high performance per clock, about 20% - 30% higher than that of predecessors, according to the claims.
Intel’s microprocessor code-named Conroe is expected to remove certain power constraints and probably widen thermal envelope of the Merom. Additional performance tweaks are also possible to bring extra speed, but the conception of a chip will still remain – a low-power highly efficient central processing unit. In addition, the Conroe will have to support the whole breed of desktop features, including virtualization capabilities, LaGrande technology, 64-bit capability in addition to EDB, EIST and iAMT2.
No Intel spokesperson would confirm or deny that the Merom and Conroe are, or are not, totally dissimilar products from the NetBurst and the P6 architectures. Still, calling Merom and Conroe as “second generation dual-core processors” and not calling Presler with such term indicates significant changes the chips may have compared to predecessors.
Comments currently:
3
Discussion started: 05/09/05 07:17:36 AM
Latest comment: 12/30/05 12:46:21 PM
[1-3]
1.
Frankly given how well the X2 is doing, Intel would be wise (which you can't count on from them) to release Yonah as soon as possible. Why? Because with a decent adaptor like the one that Asus put out for the current Pentium M, you could perhaps have a dual core chip (albeit at a costly premium) that might not get both heat, power and performance trounced by AMD. When AMD drops the x2 to 65nm it's really going to get ugly and I honestly think they may have to turn to a desktop adapted Yonah to hold the fort on the extreme end (the pricier purchasers). Mobile chips bring in the $$ anyway for Intel and maintaining a technology lead in that area would be good too. And if 64bit takes as long as I think it will to start showing useful results to the common user, Yonah would do just fine to show a low power consuming dual core from Intel can and does perform right up there with a AMD X2 design.
I note from the slide that Yonah is H2 05. That would maybe indicate that Intel sees the writing on the wall and has the technical wherewithal to make that possible. We shall see. When X2 comes AMD is going to sell as many as they can make I suspect. It has a perfect drop in upgrade path which is another thorn in Intel's side.
We shall see :)
[
Posted by: Anemone

|
Date: 05/09/05 07:17:36 AM]
2.
Intel needs to get these new processors out ASAP. They have finally learned their lesson at the hands of AMD. Assuming they don't stuff it up again somehow, these new design should put them back in the game.
[
Posted by: AlanSymes

|
Date: 05/09/05 05:47:47 PM]
3.
Thats Great news for me b/c i'm waitnig for quite a long time to become intel destop processor's complete 64 bit capable .
[
Posted by: Adeel

|
Date: 12/30/05 12:46:21 PM]
[1-3]