News
 

Bookmark and Share

(5) 

Intel Corp. recently confirmed that its Intel Pentium D processor is actually two Intel Pentium 4 cores on the same package. The firm claimed that it had to quickly create a dual-core processor in order to stay competitive, which conditioned the design of the product Intel has chosen.

“We’re putting two cores in one package; it’s like trying to fit into the pair of pants you saved from college,” said Jonathan Douglas, a principal engineer in Intel’s Digital Enterprise Group, which makes chips for office desktops and servers, reports PCWorld.

Intel first announced intention to deliver dual-core processors for various markets in May, 2004. It is now revealed that the company began to work on the project around the same time, which gave the firm a very short time to complete the development and launch the product in mass production. That said, Intel had to use existing technologies and not develop a new processor system bus, integrate memory controller into the central processing unit or perform any other enhancements.

Intel first demonstrated its dual-core processor up and running in September, 2004, at its semi-annual Intel Developer Forum. After that an analyst expressed doubts whether a “real” dual-core microprocessor was demonstrated, or two existing Pentium 4 chips were placed on the same piece of substrate. Intel opposed the analyst, but now it had confirmed the assumption: the Intel Pentium D is basically two Intel Pentium 4 processors. Still, dual-core processor means there are two processing engines plugged into a socket, which is exactly what Intel supplies.

“We faced many challenges from taking a design team focused on making the highest-performing processors possible to one focused on multi-core designs,” Mr. Douglas added during Hot Chips conference.

Intel has over 17 dual-core and multi-core projects in development.

Discussion

Comments currently: 5
Discussion started: 08/20/05 12:49:12 PM
Latest comment: 08/22/05 03:04:11 AM

[1-1]

1. 
I'd have to agree.

When you're pressured to do something, it never comes out as good as it should be.

Intel took 9 months to build the Pentium-D, this is way too short from what they usually do, which is usually 3 to 5 yrs.

I suspect the Pentium-D has some serious bottlenecking going on there.

Heck, AMD's K8 began as a dual-core on the drawing board. So they had more than adequate time to properly develop their solution. Only wish they release the X2 3800+ at the price of the Pentium-D 820...I would defintely get it.


I'm not sure how much of an effect in admitting your product is crap, has towards sales, I guess not much as I hear dual-core CPUs on the desktop market aren't selling all that well. (You can tell buy the price drops happening alot more quickly than anticipated).

Its different for the server/workstation markets, because the majority of those apps being used are multithreaded and actually benefit from an 2nd or more core or CPU.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 08/20/05 02:00:21 PM]
Reply

[1-1]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Monday, July 28, 2014

6:02 pm | Microsoft’s Mobile Strategy Seem to Fail: Sales of Lumia and Surface Remain Low. Microsoft Still Cannot Make Windows a Popular Mobile Platform

12:11 pm | Intel Core i7-5960X “Haswell-E” De-Lidded: Twelve Cores and Alloy-Based Thermal Interface. Intel Core i7-5960X Uses “Haswell-EP” Die, Promises Good Overclocking Potential

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones