News

Intel Corp. said on Monday that in addition to delay of the anticipated dual-core Itanium processor known as Montecito it would scrap plans to release its quad-core Intel Xeon MP chip code-named Whitefield and would release a faster processor named Tigerton in the same timeframe. The fundamental difference between Whitefield and Tigerton is that the latter supports a new, more efficient, bus to connect processors to the rest of the systems. Other enhancements are also possible.

Tigerton – Faster Than Whitefield, Says

“We have the opportunity to deliver better performance in 2007. Therefore, we are canceling a product and replacing it with something else,” said Intel spokeswoman Erica Fields.

Intel code-named Whitefield and Dunnington chips along with Redland platform were supposed to arrive in 2007, according to a roadmap Intel demonstrated publicly back at Intel Developer Forum Fall 2005. The company currently replaces the Whitefield chip along with the Redland platform with Tigerton processor and the Caneland platform, it emerges.

Intel Whitefield, Dunnington and Tigerton chips designed for multi-processor servers are projected to share a new micro-architecture from Intel Corp., which was confirmed earlier in 2005.  

Intel Implements Dedicated High-Speed Interconnect

The fundamental difference between the Caneland platform and the Redland platform is that the former supports so-called dedicated high-speed interconnect. The bottom line, according to what Intel claims, is that Whitefield chips were supposed to share a processor system bus in multiprocessor system, whereas Tigerton processors are expected to get dedicated interconnection to the rest of the system. Since Intel does not provide any particular details now, the final design may differ from estimations.

Earlier it was anticipated that in “the middle of the decade”, or the year 2007, as some implied, the world’s largest chipmaker unifies its Intel Xeon and Intel Itanium platform so that Xeon system builders could adopt Itanium chips without switching to different hardware. In Summer this year an Intel partner said that in 2007 Intel server platforms would use common serial interconnect (CSI) bus instead of traditional processor system bus and some processors will have built-in memory controller. The first of such chips was projected to be Tukwila, a multi-core Intel Itanium processor, which is, after the Montecito delay, scheduled for 2008. 

It is currently unknown whether the “dedicated high-speed interconnect” of the Caneland has anything to do with the common serial interconnect or is a more advanced version of the [dual] independent bus used in the Truland platforms (E8500 chipsets) available today and will be used with Bensley platforms (Blackford and Greencreek chipsets). It is also unclear whether Tigerton sports built-in memory controller, a feature that boosts performance dramatically.

Redland platform, according to Intel’s roadmaps, was not supposed to support Itanium processors. Currently it is unknown when a common platform for both Xeon and Itanium chips emerges.

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 10/26/05 05:20:45 PM
Latest comment: 10/27/05 08:04:04 AM

[1-3]

1. 
Intel ! Don't Panic!
[Posted by: Itanic  | Date: 10/26/05 05:20:45 PM]

2. 
Intel have hit the panic button.

Product designs being delayed, changed or thrown out because of you can't deliver on promises is nothing to shout about. The truth is that Intel is struggling to be competitive against AMD. Even Dell are having a tough time to release a product based on Paxville (dual-core Xeon 90nm) because of power supply and VRM's problems. Intel wanted 65nm for dual-core Xeon to increase performance while keeping power below current designs. Intel couldn't wait as demand shifted to AMD. Intel release the hot running, low performing Paxville and Dell and other customers have had very little time to prepare (Dell products delayed). Low performance 2.8GHz vs 3.2GHz of Pentium-D, also get's beaten by AMD's third from top 2GHz dual-core Opteron 270 which uses half the power as Paxville. I would not use the words 'Intel' and 'boost performance' in the same sentence. Intel are not living up to expectations and are left to using plan B's which do less than plan A's.
[Posted by: tygrus  | Date: 10/26/05 10:29:04 PM]

3. 
I agree with the posts.

I dont understand whats happening with all sites always anouncing new intel producs (almost 2 years to come), saying they are better (and they are, but not at AMD levels).

Looks like intel is really bad, because all these press releases every day anouncing this and that, but where is it?
[Posted by: Kaz  | Date: 10/27/05 08:04:04 AM]

[1-3]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS