News

Advanced Micro Devices managed to sell more processors in the most recent calendar quarter and increase its market share rather significantly, the new figures from Mercury Research that were published on the Internet claim.

In the third quarter of 2005 the Sunnyvale, California-based chipmaker managed to capture 17.8% of the market, up 1.6% from 16.2% in the prior quarter. The Santa Clara, California-based Intel Corp., by contrast, lost 1.4% of its market share and now commands 80.8% of the market, the figures published over DigiTimes web-site show. VIA Technologies supplied 1.4% of all x86 chips, whereas market share of Transmeta Corp. was 0.1%, according to Q3 data from Mercury Research.

The trend that started several quarters ago show that Intel Corp. has been losing desktop market share slowly. Currently Intel commands 77.5% of x86 desktop microprocessor market, whereas AMD’s share is 20.4%, up from 19.6% in the prior quarter and also up 1.2% compared to the Q4 2004. VIA Technologies has also been consistently improving its desktop market share: in Q3 2005 it shipped 2.1% of x86 desktop central processing units (CPUs), whereas in Q4 2004 its share was 1.5%.

While Intel is still the largest supplier of mobile processors, Advanced Micro Devices managed to improve sales of its CPUs for laptops in Q3 by 55% sequentially. The research firm believes that increased sales of mobile chips was conditioned by successful AMD Turion 64 microprocessors with low power consumption.

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 10/28/05 07:00:03 AM
Latest comment: 10/28/05 10:47:33 AM

[1-2]

1. 
Nice to see AMD making inroads into all 3 segments. The mobile sector has been their bread and butter as of late, with AMD taking hold in the Server market. Now, it looks as if the Turion is gaining significant traction against the Pentium M.

I wonder what types of gains were made because of the suit filed against Intel for anti-competitive practices.
[Posted by: mamisano  | Date: 10/28/05 07:00:03 AM]

2. 
Might be a simpler explanation - the Pentium 4 sucks bad, and the Pentium M is very expensive, although excellent. It amazes me that with a product a poor as the Pentium 4 that Intel maintained market share for as long as they have.

If Intel lowers the price of the Pentium M, they will have no problem at all with that rubbish AMD calls Turion. On the desktop, I don't see them being able to do anything. Pentium 4 is such a lousy processor.
[Posted by: TA152H  | Date: 10/28/05 10:47:33 AM]

[1-2]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Sunday, November 22, 2009

11:34 am | Voice Communications Set to Decline in Two Years – Analysts. Analysts Predict Dramatic Increase of VoIP Popularity

Saturday, November 21, 2009

11:44 pm | Barnes and Noble: Nook E-Book Readers Are Sold Out. E-Book Reader from B&N Sold Out Before Release

7:53 am | Cell Network Operators Set to Become Largest Mobile Internet Devices Sellers – Analysts. Mobile Network Operators to Gain Strength in Devices

Friday, November 20, 2009

10:11 pm | ATI Seeks Its Best to Ensure More Radeon HD 5-Series Supplies – Company. Additional Number of DirectX 11 Graphics Boards is Incoming

11:56 am | Fusion-io’s SSD Setup Reaches 1TB/s Aggregate Bandwidth. Fusion-io Gets Contracts from Government, Creates World’s Fastest SSD Setup

10:06 am | Notebook – the Most Desired Christmas Gift, Says CEA. Notebooks, Players and HDTVs Top Christmas Presents Wish List

9:11 am | Ebay Completes Skype Sell Off. Skype No Longer Belongs to Ebay