Bookmark and Share


Intel Corp., the world’s largest chipmaker, showcased at its developer forum in Taipei, Taiwan its forthcoming quad-core processor for servers. Public demonstration of the server chip that is expected to be launched in less than a year should emphasize readiness of the design.

The prototype of the code-named Clovertown server processor utilizes two physical dice on a substrate, each of the units sport two processing engines and 4MB of unified cache, thus providing four executing cores and 8MB of cache in total. Intel Corp. has already demonstrated the new product in an attempt to show off its technological excellence. However, the company did not reveal any peculiarities of the Clovertown’s design earlier.

The sample of the quad-core server chip Intel demonstrated at IDF Taipei worked at 2.0GHz, reported HKEPC web-site, whereas dual-core server processors code-named Woodcrest, which are due to be out in a few months from now, will be able to operate at up to 3.33GHz, significantly higher speed bin compared to the current quad-core prototype.

According to Cinebench 9.5 benchmark results obtained by Intel Corp., the Clovertown chip with four processing engines scores 1723, whereas the same chip that has only one core enabled hits 362. Cinebench is a free benchmarking tool for Windows and Mac OS based on the powerful 3D software Cinema 4D. The benchmark includes render tasks that test the performance of up to 16 processors on the same computer as well as software-only shading tests and OpenGL shading tests on huge numbers of animated polygons that are claimed to push any computer to its limits.

Intel’s code-named Clovertown chip is the company’s first microprocessor to feature four execution engines, or cores. The chip is designed for dual-socket servers and it is known that it is produced using 65nm process technology. Intel is also working on Tigerton, quad-core processor for multi-processor servers. Additionally, the company is designing quad-core chips for desktops and notebooks.


Comments currently: 29
Discussion started: 04/15/06 08:49:45 AM
Latest comment: 08/25/06 09:09:49 AM


We have a discussion about this at the following link:

Intel Clovertown is basically double Conroe, with 2x4MB L2 cache. The 362 Cinebench 9.5 bit edition score is lower than the Athlon 64 at the same clockspeed. This is clear indication that Intel CORE (Conroe/Merom/Clovertown) is less efficient than Hammer (Opteron/Athlon 64) clock for clock.

0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 04/15/06 08:49:45 AM]

...yea and after reading the blogspot above, I think you guys (xbitlabs) should check to make sure your article is correct. It looks like Intel was running a 2Chip (8core) setup when it got the score in the 1700s. Which would give a pretty lame performance scale of 4.76x for 8 cores.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 04/15/06 10:48:16 AM]


Add your Comment

Related news

Latest News

Thursday, August 21, 2014

10:33 pm | Avexir Readies 3.40GHz DDR4 Memory Modules. DDR4 Could Hit 3.40GHz This Year

12:10 pm | AMD to Lower Prices of A-Series APUs for Back-to-School Season. New Prices of AMD A-Series APUs Revealed

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

10:53 am | AMD to Cut Prices on FX-9000, Other FX Processors: New Prices Revealed. AMD to Make FX Chips More Affordable, Discontinue Low-End Models

10:32 am | LG to Introduce World’s First Curved 21:9 Ultra-Wide Display. LG Brings Curved Displays to Gamers, Professionals

9:59 am | AMD Readies FX-8370, FX-8370E Microprocessors. AMD Preps Two New “Mainstream” FX Chips