Phil Hester, chief technology officer at Advanced Micro Devices, the world’s second largest maker of central processing units, said at a conference that the integration of graphics processing units (GPUs) into central processing units will allow personal computers to achieve performance of supercomputers eventually.
“Get ready for round two of the "attack of the killer micros. By combining graphics processing unit (GPU) and CPU functions in heterogeneous cores, microprocessors will bring supercomputer performance to the desktop,” said Phil Hester, in a keynote speech at the International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD) in San Jose, California, reports EETimes web-site.
The chief technologist at AMD believes that in order to achieve tremendous computing power on the desktop, central processing units (CPUs) should start utilizing heterogeneous multi-core design, where each of the cores will be able to perform certain types of tasks very rapidly. Given that theoretical peak power of modern GPUs is much higher than that of CPUs, it is natural to built in GPUs into CPUs to increase performance.
“A step increase in microprocessor performance per watt per dollar is needed. But simply adding more homogeneous CPU cores to a baseline architecture is not good enough. The solution is to adopt a heterogeneous architecture with GPU/CPU silicon-level integration,” Mr. Hester is reported to have said.
Mr. Hester also called integration of graphics processing engines into AMD’s chips as the “biggest microprocessor evolution” since the introduction of x86-64 concept back in 1999. Advanced Micro Devices proposed 64-bit extensions to x86 architecture seven years ago and has managed to transform the x86-64 technology into an industrial standard since then, which stresses how significant the idea to combine CPU and GPU is.
However, according to Mr. Hester, there are two significant design challenges in developing heterogeneous architectures (that combine CPU and GPU) – power management and memory hierarchy.
Comments currently:
9
Discussion started: 11/07/06 12:46:41 PM
Latest comment: 07/24/08 01:42:44 AM
[1-9]
1.
Says AMD... and who cares about what AMD says?
[
Posted by: 1234

|
Date: 11/07/06 12:46:41 PM]
2.
Intel clearly cared enough with AMD 64 to use it themselves. CPU/GPU processors are just another evolutionary step for the modern processor.
[
Posted by: AlanSymes

|
Date: 11/07/06 04:00:14 PM]
3.
What about cooling? GPU + CPU may generate 200W or more
[
Posted by: Ja

|
Date: 11/07/06 11:10:31 PM]
4.
This is a logical evolution fueld by the fact that it's possible to cram in more and more transisitors in the same circuit, which makes it cheaper and more efficent to put as much functionality as possible in as few circuits as possible. You only have to compare the content of a computer of today with a couple of year old machine to see where it's heading. The final goal will be a single-chip computer, or at least only having the upgradeable functionality in specific chips.
my thoughts.
[
Posted by: pyngve

|
Date: 11/09/06 04:20:27 AM]
5.
which may be the best desktop processor ( currently) Intel quad core
or AMD
[
Posted by: jak

|
Date: 11/13/06 06:50:54 AM]
6.
I think that with this new evolution, the Microproccessor in our computer will have the capabilities to control and execute functions at a much faster rate. However heat dispertion will be the biggest problem. The heat sink will have to be at least 3 times bigger than the biggest heatsinks of today. The power lost in one of these processors in heat will, in all actuality, probably be more than is actually used in the transistors. I know that they could probably fir the whole thing into a chip the size of a saltine, but it would probably need to be the size of a CD case for the heat to be dispersed so the transistors don't short together.
[
Posted by: Stephen

|
Date: 11/30/06 05:00:00 PM]
7.
i had core2 duo for only 8 days.it is not so superb as they said.to much problems with mbo ecs 650i
slit-a.i am now on amd again.hope that amd is making a new socket and stronger cpu.
[
Posted by: jelec

|
Date: 05/18/07 04:12:49 AM]
8.
Sounds like we could be in for a return to simpler times. I think the graphics card of the near future will be more-or-less just a very simple processor for shifting data out of on-card memory and off to the screen.
As for the CPU, I expect we'll see compilers that will be able to take advantage of the multiple core architectures and have the blocks of code best suited to execution on a certain kind of core automatically assigned to it. Of course, this could also allow additional parallelism in multi-threaded code, provided the programmer knows how to write threads for the different cores.
We could well be coming full circle in the next few years, with everything going back to being done on the CPU, just like in the days of DOS.
[
Posted by: Rohan

|
Date: 10/26/07 09:23:15 PM]
9.
good web page
[
Posted by: venkatesh

|
Date: 07/24/08 01:42:44 AM]
[1-9]