AMD seems to be close to financial disaster. Pessimistic analysts as well as most other analysts who have been always sticking to the principle “hope for the worst if you don’t want to get disappointed”, have been very active towards AMD lately. And one of the primary reasons for that is the financial quarterly report for Q1 2007 that the company has recently made public.
The numbers presented in this report look far from acceptable for the company, I would say. And unfortunately, most analysts predict that it may get even worse than that.
According to EETimes, even the most pessimistic forecasts didn’t picture AMD’s current financial situation in such gloomy tones. Besides the aggravating economical situation, the company has lost a significant share of the market. According to iSuppli, Intel’s and AMD’s market shares in Q4 2006 equaled 75.7% and 15.7% respectively, but in Q1 2007 these numbers have changed to 80.2% and 11.1%. This is the first serious change like that over the last few years.
At this time everyone is looking forward to Q2-Q3 2007. This is when AMD is expected to announce new graphics (R600) and new processor (Barcelona) technologies that should (or shouldn’t) help the company make up for the lost market share.
In the meanwhile the same analysts believe that AMD’s current finances will last them only for the next few quarters. What happens next is really hard to tell. The company needed more than a year to shake Intel’s positions. Now they obviously don’t have that much time. Anyway, no matter what is going to happen, let’s wish AMD luck. It is obviously in our best interest :)
Comments currently:
6
Discussion started: 04/24/07 12:55:44 PM
Latest comment: 04/26/07 03:55:30 PM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-5]
1.
Odd you'd make sure a vague report the same day AMD announced an 8 year note with a conversion price twice the current market price .
http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?storyID=urn :newsml:reuters.com:20070424:MTFH34847_2007-04-24_13-39-05 _WNAS7381
Market share news:
http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?storyID=urn :newsml:reuters.com:20070424:MTFH44654_2007-04-24_19-36-06 _N24434675
Trust that those putting up two billion USD at only 6% know what they're doing.
[
Posted by: Mallissin

|
Date: 04/24/07 12:55:45 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Well I think AMD has a great future tech, but somehow current tech planning was dumped;it has a serious tech transition feel.
[
Posted by: verndewd

|
Date: 04/24/07 02:33:05 PM]
2.
wish them luck ,pray ;scream at the top of your lungs till they answer intel. Whatever it takes short of an enthusiast hostile takeover.
[
Posted by: verndewd

|
Date: 04/24/07 02:31:31 PM]
3.
If they indeed file to brancrupcy, IBM will probably buy them. They have the financial tools to put something of that size back to market.
Intel won't be allowed to buy them, the US and EU will complain.
Their properties will be bought by someone, it won't disappear.
I don't think that it will happen any time soon. Not this short time after buying ATI. You have to be certain before you buy something that big.
[
Posted by: What ever!

|
Date: 04/24/07 03:54:11 PM]
4.
AMD K10 quad core 2.5 GHz -> AMD Phenom X4 2500
This will be a monster: +50% FP, +20% INT vs Clovertown.
AMD R600 -> ATI Radeon HD 2900, 2600 and 2400 will crush nVidia's offering.
And some surprise will come in the 3Q -> 256 bit version in 65 nm.
AMD is here to stay.
If it's good for the competition then it's good for us.
[
Posted by: Wirmish

|
Date: 04/24/07 06:51:46 PM]
5.
About time AMD/ATI will go bankrupt, R600 HD2900XTX is a fiasco with performance far below expected and compared to nvidias 8800GTX. They omly have themselves to blame.(see anandtech for article R600 doomed at start)
[
Posted by: Badpritt

|
Date: 04/26/07 03:55:30 PM]
[1-5]