News

Advanced Micro Devices will start using a new marking scheme for its future microprocessors after years of using model numbering scheme designed to mimic high clock-speeds of microprocessors by Intel Corp. The question is whether the new way of marking chips will actually help end-users to better understand what kind of microprocessor they are getting.

AMD’s new processor naming scheme will consist of two letters and four numbers, which will describe product classification, power consumption and relative performance within the lineup, reports a news-story by DigiTimes web-site. A similar naming scheme is presently used also by Intel Corp. for its central processing units. 

  • The first letter represents market positioning of the product. E.g., G represents premium product, B represents intermediate/mainstream product and L represents value product.
  • The second letter reflects thermal design power of the chip. For example, P represents over 65W, S around 65W and E less than 65W.
  • The first digit of the four-digit number indicates the product family: 1000 represents single-core AMD Athlon or AMD Sempron, 2000 represents dual-core AMD Athlon, 6000 represents dual-core AMD Phenom, 7000 represents quad-core AMD Phenom processors.
  • The second digit indicates relative clock-speed within the product family.
  • The two remaining digits will be used for the future upgrade functions, said Leslie Sobon, director of product and brand management in AMD.

For example, AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350 processor is a mainstream-class dual-core microprocessor with less than 65W power consumption (45W).

Even though the new naming scheme is aimed to make it easier for consumers to distinguish various chips from AMD between each other, it is highly disputable whether typical end-users will remember that 6000-series chips contain two processing engines, 7000-series of chips feature quad-core technology, whereas 2000-series of products again have two cores. Moreover, the difference between 2000-series and 6000-series of products may not be clear or representative, which will make it impossible to see the difference in performance, for example, of AMD Turion 64 X2 and AMD Athlon X2 BE-2000-series.

Discussion

Comments currently: 6
Discussion started: 06/20/07 07:13:53 AM
Latest comment: 06/25/07 02:59:57 PM

[1-6]

1. 
Never seen such a cra**y numbering scheme EVAR
[Posted by: 1234  | Date: 06/20/07 07:13:53 AM]

2. 
how about:

H: High-End
M: Mid-End
L-Low End

followed by:

A: Above 65W
B: About 65W
C: Below 65W

then:

1C: Single Core
2C: Dual Core
4C: Quad-Core

and finaly:

XX : the first two digits of the mhz meter. AKA: if its a 2.2ghz chip its 22.

example:

About 65W, Dual-Core, 2400mhz.

how complicated could: MB-2C24 be?
[Posted by: NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  | Date: 06/20/07 08:51:09 PM]

3. 
Is this an indication because the new core ( Phenom? ) isn't performing according to expectations so they try to lure it's Customers by psychological means?
[Posted by: huh??  | Date: 06/21/07 08:54:16 AM]

4. 
A lesson of how to make something that could be kindergarten simple into having absolutely NO meaning whatsoever

Very Bad Move AMD
[Posted by: alpha0ne  | Date: 06/21/07 11:16:46 PM]

5. 
So which is faster an AMD 6350 or an Intel 6600 ?

Marketing have now tried as much as possible to inhibit comparison of competing CPU's and memorising conversion factors.

It was once easy to think of the following compared to the old Intel copermine PIII (depends on FSB,RAM,cache, and ofcourse..code):-
PIII=1x
P4=0.67x to .8x
Dothan=1.2x
Core 2 Duo=1.6x for each core
AMD=1.3x

Now I need crib sheets 4pages long to list all the model codes, freq, core count, cache, FSB, relative performance etc. It's very hard for the consumer to make an informed choice of performance and which product to buy.
[Posted by: tygrus  | Date: 06/24/07 06:20:22 PM]

6. 
Wow. they could've made that so much easier for us to remember..

1000 for single cores
2000 for dual cores
4000 for quad cores

they could've just put 45w, 60w or 90w in the name instead of random letters..

That would've been perfect. Way to go AMD.
[Posted by: Spense  | Date: 06/25/07 02:59:57 PM]

[1-6]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS