News

Intel processors from the Nehalem generation that are scheduled to appear in H2 2008 will exist in two modifications: Socket H (LGA 715) and Socket B (LGA 1336). This difference in the number of pins is determined by Intel’s decision to offer two CPU modifications: with the integrated three-channel memory controller and without it.

According to The Inquirer, Intel is not hurrying to introduce integrated memory controllers and graphics cores all over the place. The first generation of desktop Nehalem processors will use traditional North Bridges with the graphics core and the memory controller integrated into them. An exception will be made, however, for server Nehalem processors: they need the integrated memory controller to compete successfully with the AMD Opteron CPUs. Desktop and mobile Nehalem processors will have no integrated memory controller, or will have it disabled. This way we can clearly see that desktop Nehalem processors will use Socket H design, while their server counterparts will work in Socket B. The integrated memory controller is also expected to become an attribute of the Extreme Edition Nehalem processors.

Intel is reported to already have the first samples of Tylersburg chipset for upcoming processors available. At the same time, the first engineering samples of the new Nehalem CPU should be sent out to Intel partners only in October.

Tylersburg chipset will be designed specifically for Nehalem based desktop systems. It will be more economical and will have more PCI Express lines. The chipset will support new series processor bus aka CSI with point-to-point topology, which will be introduced in the future generation Intel processors.
 
Intel's next-generation 45nm Hi-k microarchitecture (code named "Nehalem") is the first truly dynamic and design-scalable microarchitecture that will deliver both performance on demand and optimal price/performance/energy efficiency for mobile, desktop, and server platforms.

Dynamically scalable for maximum performance on demand with energy efficiency:

  • Dynamically managed cores, threads, cache, interfaces, and power
  • Leverages four-instruction issue Intel Core microarchitecture
  • Simultaneous multithreading to enhance performance and energy efficiency
  • New Streaming SIMD Extensions 4 (SSE4) and ATA instruction set architecture additions
  • Multi-level shared cache leverages Intel Smart Cache
  • Increased system and memory bandwidth
  • Performance enhanced dynamic power management

Design scalable for optimal price/performance/energy efficiency in each market segment:

  • New system architecture for next-generation Intel processors and platforms
  • Scalable performance: 1 to 16+ threads, 1 to 8+ cores, scalable cache sizes
  • Scalable and configurable system interconnects and integrated memory controllers
  • High-performance integrated graphics engine for client

Discussion

Comments currently: 7
Discussion started: 08/15/07 07:45:33 PM
Latest comment: 10/04/07 04:00:59 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-3]

1. 
Intel knows the self-evident truth:

The on-processor memory controller is really only a benefit for the server environment.

With Core2 wailing on the memory controller-equipped K8 and (forthcoming) K10 desktop arch, it shows AMD only had enough money to develop one arch and HOPE it was enough.
[Posted by: mark1  | Date: 08/15/07 07:45:33 PM]
+ expand thread (4 answers)

2. 
What I want to know is how much of a performance boost does an on-processor memory controller give? And how much north bridge bandwidth would it free up?
I am still using my single core 2.6Ghz AMD processor... And for online 64 player Battlefield 2 at 1280x1024 resolution, it is fine. The only software I own that my P.C. struggles with is the 'Total Annihilation' sequel 'Supreme Commander'.
[Posted by: Mike P  | Date: 10/04/07 03:11:47 PM]

3. 
One more point that Intel seem to have missed, if an integrated memory controller provides for a more efficient processor and also gives a performance boost, then amongst the community of computer users that care about such things, this kind of thing matters.
Compare computers to cars; does a car with GTi badge really need a turbo charger? The answer is probably no, but it sure sells GTi badged cars and the kick of a turbo probably gives a big buzz to a GTi owner.
If a Nehalem owner knows that Intel could have used the more elegant integrated memory controller, but Intel elected not to, then he might feel a bit shortchanged. After all, AMD have been using them in their desktop processors for years now.
[Posted by: Mike P  | Date: 10/04/07 04:00:58 PM]

[1-3]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS