Bookmark and Share

Tags

32nm 40nm 45nm AMD Apple ASUS ATI ATIC Atom Business Cypress E-Book Evergreen Fermi Flash Geforce Globalfoundries GT300 Intel Microsoft Nforce Nokia Nvidia Radeon Semiconductor Sony SSD TSMC USB Windows

News

Advanced Micro Devices, the world’s second largest maker of x86 microprocessors, has been receiving criticism for the postponement of its new quad-core chips as well as chips based on the new-generation micro-architecture for months. But only now, a little less than a month ahead of the launch the firm is ready to talk about its problems.

Chief executive of AMD admitted that the highly-anticipated quad-core AMD Opteron is half a year late to market because of a variety of technical issues. At the same time, he predicts that the battle between the chip code-named Barcelona and products by Intel Corp. will be very intense this fall and world’s first single-die x86 quad-core processor will not have an advantage AMD Opteron had over its rivals.

“We’re doing something that nobody has ever done. As strong as our competitor is, they have not done a [monolith] quad-core on a chip… Every time we ran into a gotcha (a technical glitch), it created a six-week or so hole in the schedule as we went back and fixed it. We hoped we wouldn’t get many of those, but in the Barcelona case, we got more than we thought. By the time we got through fixing them all, we were six months-plus late from where we originally wanted to be,” said Hector Ruiz, chairman and chief executive of AMD, in an interview with Mercury News.

Six months delay from the original schedule not only means that the company has missed its revenue predictions, but also indicates that the chipmaker will have to compete against Intel’s products that it did not originally target with the first breed of quad-core AMD Opteron “Barcelona” offerings. As a result, the competition between the new server chips will be fierce across all aspects, including performance, scalability, power consumption, pricing, manageability, cost of ownership and so on.

“I expect us to regain position in the server market because Barcelona is a very strong product. It won’t have the huge impact Opteron had. If you remember at the time Intel had no new product (to compete against it). So it will be more challenging. What we’re anticipating is that Intel and AMD are going to be very competitive in every space going forward. We’ve become big and strong enough and credible enough that we are going to flip back and forth in leadership,” Mr. Ruiz said.

Quad-core AMD Opteron processors code-named Barcelona are based on the company’s next-generation micro-architecture and will be produced using 65nm process technology. Among the highlights of AMD’s new chips the manufacturer lists shared 2MB L3 cache, 128-bit floating point units (FPU), SSE4A instructions, support for dual-channel DDR2 memory and other innovations. The first Barcelona processors are scheduled for shipments in August with product availability in September.

Discussion

Comments currently: 14
Discussion started: 08/22/07 05:22:41 AM
Latest comment: 09/14/07 08:48:16 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-6]

1. 
It's FAR, FAR better to resolve design issues before you launch than to sell the crap Intel, Asus, MICROSUCKS and many other companies rush out the door for the gullible sheep to buy up like crack cocaine. Intel still does not have anything but glue blobs for CPUs.

AMD has integrity which the above crowd will never have. Consumers who support unscrupulous companies who constantly ship defective goods deserve exactly what they get or don't. I vote with my wallet and I buy the best products for my company from reputable suppliers.
[Posted by: Jorge  | Date: 08/22/07 05:22:41 AM]
+ expand thread (3 answers)

2. 
I hope for his sake the market is as forgiving...
6 month late in the IC world and in this case competing against Intel is suicide.
[Posted by: huh  | Date: 08/22/07 06:54:59 AM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)

3. 
Given Intel's new tick-tock cycle, AMD can barely afford to be 6 months late.
[Posted by: fl0pY  | Date: 08/22/07 07:03:35 AM]

4. 
6 months late may just be too late.

Well I guess we shall se how it performs, but while AMD will be field testing their new chip Intel has tested theirs and is pretty sure they could release chips running as high as 4GHz. It's true that the double core approach has limitations compared to a native quad core design, but it also had the advantage of being easier to manufacture and running at higher clocks stably.

Even if the per clock performance is greater on the AMD side with these new chips it will have to be significantly greater to match Intel's high clocks. From what I understand the chips AMD expects to launch will be clocked well under 3 GHz, and even if AMD gains a little advantage now this isn't the Intel of years past. Intel is working on new technology for new chips instead of sitting on their current architecture like they did with NetBurst. Either way the competition will be good for the consumer. We will just have to see if AMD is going to stick around to keep on competing. I sure hope so since I usually go with AMD.
[Posted by: Megamanx00  | Date: 08/22/07 03:39:06 PM]

5. 
Craaaaaaap
[Posted by: zxtxtxt  | Date: 08/24/07 08:04:13 AM]

6. 
AMD has delayed the K8 for a few years. Now people criticized AMD delaying again, but this time it is a lot shorter. It best to not to rush instead make a big bang when the product is mature. A quad core is a lot more complex than double core processor. Designing a monolithic processor increases the complexity of the construction phase.

The clock speed of a processor is not a good way to compare one system and then to the next because of the performance factor. Also power consumption is on some users mind's, so the need for speed can be counter productive.

FYI, ATI was bought by AMD and it is not AMD's fault that ATI engineers can not adapt to new surroundings. Sure, there was some layoffs. Though if the funding is not there, projects will be put on hold. This is ok in the graphics industry because it is a slow business.
[Posted by: linuxnerd  | Date: 08/24/07 11:17:22 PM]
+ expand thread (3 answers)

[1-6]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

4:04 pm | Imagination Intros Processors for “Internet Everywhere” Consumer Electronics. Imagination Presents Connected Processors for CE Devices

3:33 pm | Sub-$99 Blu-Ray Players Black Friday Deals Available, But Not a Lot. Walmart to Sell BD Players for $78 on Black Friday

12:27 pm | Microsoft Sued for Banning Third-Party Xbox Memory Cards. Memory Cards Supplier Sues Microsoft

11:55 am | OCZ to Release External USB 3.0 Solid-State Drive. OCZ USB 3.0 SSD Incoming for Consumer Electronics Show

7:52 am | Nvidia’s CEO Expects Underpowered Mobile Devices to Gain Popularity. PC of the Future – Web-Based Device with 4G Connectivity, Says Chief Exec of Nvidia