News

Even though Intel Corp. unveiled its first quad-core microprocessor almost a year ahead of Advanced Micro Devices, the latter can still boast with the first ever “native” x86 central processing unit when it rolls out its code-named Barcelona processor on the 10th of September. But Intel claims that while it did not “make sense” to make single-die quad-core chip in 2006, it will be able to roll it out in 2008.

Currently available quad-core Intel Core 2 and Xeon chips integrate two dual-core chips on one piece of substrate, which gives the manufacturer additional flexibility in terms of manufacturing, but requires the processing engines to communicate using processor system bus, not the most efficient communication path, which, AMD believes, reduces performance.

“At 65nm the die would be too big to hold four [Intel] cores and it would be so expensive it would not make sense. Our 45nm process technology will allow us to do a monolithic quad-core design,” said Diane M. Bryant, Intel’s vice president of digital enterprise group and general manager of server platforms group, in an interview with EETimes web-site.

In 2008 Intel is projected to roll-out microprocessors based on the next-generation Nehalem micro-architecture. It is expected that the chips will have built-in memory controllers and will require new platforms. Considering the integrated memory controller and some other design aspects, it is highly likely that Intel will have to create a monolithic implementation of its quad-core. However, it is doubtful that built-in memory controllers will allow Intel to easily create octa-core chip.

Ms. Bryant did not unveil any other peculiarities of Intel’s single-die quad-core products.

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 09/11/07 06:22:51 AM
Latest comment: 09/12/07 08:35:59 PM

[1-2]

1. 
Intel FUD dissected:

"But Intel claims that while it did not “make sense” to make single-die quad-core chip in 2006, it will be able to roll it out in 2008."

Maybe because they are late with it and don’t have it make sense to say this?


“At 65nm the die would be too big to hold four [Intel] cores and it would be so expensive it would not make sense.”

Well then it doesn’t make sense to build Itanium either, unless Itanium is cheap to make? Specially at the high cmos processes that Intel have been doing it?

Unless the expensive to make, means more Engineers, more money “wasted” at the design or the processor would be more expensive for us?


"Our 45nm process technology will allow us to do a monolithic quad-core design"

Since when cmos processes build monolithic designs? Unless AMD version is virtual? Unreal?
[Posted by: Joker  | Date: 09/11/07 06:22:51 AM]

2. 
Evil papagali wants to kill!

He ordered me a puta que paril!
[Posted by: Assmann dutch bitchie ass  | Date: 09/12/07 08:35:59 PM]

[1-2]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS