News

Even though Intel Corp. unveiled its first quad-core microprocessor almost a year ahead of Advanced Micro Devices, the latter can still boast with the first ever “native” x86 central processing unit when it rolls out its code-named Barcelona processor on the 10th of September. But Intel claims that while it did not “make sense” to make single-die quad-core chip in 2006, it will be able to roll it out in 2008.

Currently available quad-core Intel Core 2 and Xeon chips integrate two dual-core chips on one piece of substrate, which gives the manufacturer additional flexibility in terms of manufacturing, but requires the processing engines to communicate using processor system bus, not the most efficient communication path, which, AMD believes, reduces performance.

“At 65nm the die would be too big to hold four [Intel] cores and it would be so expensive it would not make sense. Our 45nm process technology will allow us to do a monolithic quad-core design,” said Diane M. Bryant, Intel’s vice president of digital enterprise group and general manager of server platforms group, in an interview with EETimes web-site.

In 2008 Intel is projected to roll-out microprocessors based on the next-generation Nehalem micro-architecture. It is expected that the chips will have built-in memory controllers and will require new platforms. Considering the integrated memory controller and some other design aspects, it is highly likely that Intel will have to create a monolithic implementation of its quad-core. However, it is doubtful that built-in memory controllers will allow Intel to easily create octa-core chip.

Ms. Bryant did not unveil any other peculiarities of Intel’s single-die quad-core products.

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 09/11/07 06:22:51 AM
Latest comment: 09/12/07 08:35:59 PM

[1-2]

1. 
Intel FUD dissected:

"But Intel claims that while it did not “make sense” to make single-die quad-core chip in 2006, it will be able to roll it out in 2008."

Maybe because they are late with it and don’t have it make sense to say this?


“At 65nm the die would be too big to hold four [Intel] cores and it would be so expensive it would not make sense.”

Well then it doesn’t make sense to build Itanium either, unless Itanium is cheap to make? Specially at the high cmos processes that Intel have been doing it?

Unless the expensive to make, means more Engineers, more money “wasted” at the design or the processor would be more expensive for us?


"Our 45nm process technology will allow us to do a monolithic quad-core design"

Since when cmos processes build monolithic designs? Unless AMD version is virtual? Unreal?
[Posted by: Joker  | Date: 09/11/07 06:22:51 AM]

2. 
Evil papagali wants to kill!

He ordered me a puta que paril!
[Posted by: Assmann dutch bitchie ass  | Date: 09/12/07 08:35:59 PM]

[1-2]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Friday, July 3, 2009

5:50 pm | Apple Reminds: iPhone and iPod Overheat at 35 Degrees Celcius. Apple Issues Warning Concerning Overheating

1:09 pm | Former Intel’s Chief Does Not Expect Quick Results from Intel-Nokia Pact. Feasibility of Intel’s and Nokia’s Partnership to Be Clear in Several Years

9:15 am | Nvidia's Chief Executive Publicly Unveils Pricing of "Ion" Core-Logic. Nvidia’s Ion Platform Appears to Be Up to Three Times More Expensive than Intel’s

Thursday, July 2, 2009

11:42 pm | Transcend Equips Memory Modules with Thermal Sensors. Transcend's New Memory Modules Can Monitor Their Temperature

10:17 pm | AMD Will Not Support Nvidia's CUDA Technology. AMD Not Interested in Supporting Nvidia's CUDA

3:46 pm | Sony Claims that UMD-Less PlayStation Portable Was Always In The Plans. Sony's Claims Raises Question Whether UMD Ever Was a Compulsory Element of PSP

12:43 pm | DDR3 to Capture 30% of the Market by Year End - DRAMeXchange. Contract DDR3 Prices to Increase in July