News

Intel’s code-named Nehalem processors have been projected to tangibly change Intel-based personal computer (PC) architecture thanks to new micro-architecture and built-in memory controller. But the actual transformation of Intel PC platform may be even more dramatic, as the forthcoming chips will have built-in graphics core and PCI Express support.

The first version of the Nehalem processor family will be the code-named Bloomfield chip aimed at extreme desktops/workstations, high-end desktops and servers as well as on some other quite expensive systems. The central processing unit (CPU) will have built-in triple-channel memory controller, will use Quick Path Interconnect (QPI) bus to connect to other chips within the system and will utilize LGA1366 form-factor. In general, Bloomfield-based PC platforms will resemble traditional AMD64 system architecture with CPU, North Bridge and I/O controller.

But microprocessors from the Nehalem family aimed at mainstream market – code-named Lynnfield and Havendale – will have substantial differences compared to Bloomfield, which will catalyze dramatic changes to PC architecture going forward, reports PC Watch web-site.

Intel’s Lynnfield processor is a Nehalem micro-architecture-based monolith quad-core microprocessor in LGA1160 form-factor with dual-channel DDR3 memory controller as well as PCI Express 2.0 x16 interface to connect add-on graphics cards.

Intel’s Havendale processor is multi-chip module (MCM) in LGA1160 form-factor containing Nehalem micro-architecture-based dual-core CPU as well as graphics and memory controller hub (GMCH) that features dual-channel DDR3 memory controller, PCI Express 2.0 x16 interface to connect add-on graphics cards as well as integrated graphics core. It is projected that both chips on the MCM are made using 45nm process technology.

Since both Lynnfield and Havendale have memory controller as well as PCI Express interconnection inside, there will be no need for GMCH (or North Bridge) on the mainboard. Instead, the new processors will connect directly to code-named Ibexpeak platform controller hub (PCH) that will carry hard drive controller, wired and wireless network controllers, monitor physical interfaces, PCI controller and other input/output as well as platform-related capabilities.

If today’s mainstream personal computers usually employ three chips that feature the core functionality of the system – CPU, (G)MCH and I/O controller – then in the Nehalem era mainstream systems will be based only on two chips: CPU and PCH. Both Lynnfield and Havendale are projected to emerge in the first half of 2009.

Intel officials did not comment on the news-story.

Discussion

Comments currently: 26
Discussion started: 11/29/07 06:55:35 AM
Latest comment: 11/30/07 11:43:08 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-13]

1. 
yah... these chips will surely get AMD pissing in their pants!
[Posted by: provoko is a stupid AMD fanboy  | Date: 11/29/07 06:55:35 AM]

2. 
That's not quite true. Tylersburg platform will consist of a Nehalem-based CPU (with IMC) + IOH + ICH10.
[Posted by: Mumak  | Date: 11/29/07 07:13:04 AM]

3. 
>yah... these chips will surely get AMD pissing in their pants!

If all AMD stuff goes falls in coma. Also if you know intel, and you dont, it will probably be nothing special.
[Posted by: BorgDrone  | Date: 11/29/07 08:28:07 AM]
+ expand thread (5 answers)

4. 
Very nice. Its nice to see some innovation and progress in the processor world, from intel ofcourse.
[Posted by: Mr. BonBon  | Date: 11/29/07 09:52:53 AM]

5. 
""Both Lynnfield and Havendale are projected to emerge in the first half of 2009.""


Er..... I think that's wrong.... Don't they mean the first half of 2008?
If I remember Intels' roadmap, the first Nahalems come next summer, then the 35nm parts come in early 2009.


Good article, but a little too technical for average dummies like me to understand. Just say it---- These chips rock!
[Posted by: gamebro  | Date: 11/29/07 10:33:15 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

6. 
OMG, thats big... just... BIG!
Especially those PCIe integrated into the CPU could be really amazing.
[Posted by: 1234  | Date: 11/29/07 11:12:55 AM]

7. 
As always Intel provides a lot a acronyms instead of saying System-on-Chip. Also they add their proprietary connection to external devices which is closed. Hypertransport is a lot better, faster, and it is open. Intel including a graphic controller will introduce more problems such as heat. In the past Intel graphics lacks reliability in 3D applications and other operating systems. Also they have cut corners for limited resolutions. As with all Intel products, it takes two chances to get things just right.
[Posted by: linunerd  | Date: 11/29/07 11:39:48 AM]
+ expand thread (3 answers)

8. 
According to Dailytech, they said the desktop variant will have 715pins while the server will have 1366pins.

The 1160 is still unknown
[Posted by: dsfds  | Date: 11/29/07 07:49:31 PM]

9. 
Right now we heard nothing of intel's success about intergrated memory controller in the chip which they tried long ago and failed. Anyway, let's say they'll succeed this time, shall we also expect them to succeed into:

[1] going triple channel
[2] implementing graphical chips?!
[3] integrating pci-e controllers?!
[4] going native quad cores instead of 2 duals stuck on the same chip?!
[5] be performing as expected
[6] no frequency limit due to the apparent increase in transistor count and the complexity of such architecture.

all within 1.5 years max?!!!!! that's just crazy talk IMO, though i would really LOVE to be proven wrong.

Another thing, how much will a high end motherboard cost?! 50$?! that'll be interesting to see.

Another thing, i hate the part where high end chips are supporting triple channel while mid-range/entery-level are going dual channel.
[Posted by: This is just too big to be even accepted  | Date: 11/29/07 10:47:38 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

10. 
intel are unstoppable

and those specs are just amazing
A direct link from GPU to CPU

And option b/w cheap dual die quad core or relatively expensive monolith quad core
[Posted by: radicalx  | Date: 11/30/07 02:50:34 AM]

11. 
@I\'m an AMD Fanboy and I\'m crap!
Good for you.

Back on Topic:
Actually i also believe this is too big to be done within 1 year or even 1.5 years, though only time will tell.

If this is done overcoming the points "This is just too big to be even accepted" mentioned, i think this might become the greatest year in the history of microprocessors EVA

[Posted by: DeMagH  | Date: 11/30/07 05:08:02 AM]
+ expand thread (3 answers)

12. 
Looks as if the 780i mainboard will be obsolete a year after its introduced. 790i?
[Posted by: S  | Date: 11/30/07 08:20:18 AM]

13. 
ROFL, knowing AMD, as soon as Intel introduced a CPU with an onboard MC, AMD will come out with chips without one, and say northbridge MC's are superior to cpu MCs


AMD, ake your hand, and smaka-your-selfa.
[Posted by: Joz  | Date: 11/30/07 11:23:49 AM]

[1-13]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS