Intel Corp. may postpone the actual release of its quad-core microprocessors produced using 45nm process technology due to an undisclosed defect and the fact that both Intel and its partners have a lot of central processing units (CPUs) with four processing engines made using 65nm tech in stock. It is unclear whether the delay will affect the world’s largest x86 chipmaker financially.
Initially Intel planned to roll-out its code-named Wolfdale and Yorkfield microprocessors that are projected to be marketed under Intel Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme brand-names on the 10th of January, 2008. But the plans have changed and, according to a news-story at HKEPC web-site, Intel will only be able to release dual-core Intel Core 2 Duo 8000-series (Wolfdale) processors in February, while Intel Core 2 Quad 9000-series (Yorkfield) will only see the light of the day in February or March.
The media report claims that Intel has discovered a “slight processor system bus defect” in its quad-core processors code-named Yorkfield. In addition, there are Intel Core 2 Quad 6000-series processors made at 65nm process technology, which are still unbeatable by AMD Phenom rivals with four processing engines. In fact, the release of the Intel Core Q9000-series chips would negatively affect sales of already available quad-core products.
Currently Intel commercially ships a family of processors made using 45nm process technology, which includes its Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 processor for high-end desktops and workstations as well as a lineup of various Intel Xeon processors with two or four processing engines for dual-pcoressor workstations.
Each of Intel’s dual-core central processing units made using 45nm process technology have 410 million transistors, up significantly from 291 million of current dual-core Conroe processors, however, thanks to 45nm process technology, the chips will have die size of 107 square millimeters, down about 25% from 155 square millimeters of the Conroe, which means significant cost reduction. Intel’s quad-core chips consist of two dual-core dice on a single piece of substrate.
Intel’s new CPUs produced using 45nm process technology have greater instructions per clock (IPC) execution, which means that they will be faster and more efficient even at the same clock-speeds with the current generation chips. Besides, the new chips should be able to run at higher clock-speeds compared to today’s Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad products.
The major micro-architectural improvements for new Intel Core 2 processors, besides SSE4 instruction set, include the so-called Unique Super Shuffle Engine and Radix 16 technique. The Super Shuffle Engine is a full-width, single-pass shuffle unit that is 128-bits wide, which can perform full-width shuffles in a single cycle. This significantly improves performance for SSE2, SSE3 and SSE4 instructions that have shuffle-like operations such as pack, unpack and wider packed shifts. This feature will increase performance for content creation, imaging, video and high-performance computing. Radix 16 technique, according to Intel, roughly doubles the divider speed over previous generations for computations used in nearly all applications. In addition, Intel also improved virtualization technology as well as added some features to dynamic acceleration technology, which is supposed to boost single-threaded applications’ performance on multi-core chips.
Comments currently:
14
Discussion started: 12/19/07 02:00:17 PM
Latest comment: 01/21/08 10:03:27 PM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-9]
1.
This report was already denied by Intel http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2007/12/in tel_says_nuts.html
[
Posted by: wut

|
Date: 12/19/07 02:00:17 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
As per your other news article, the delay is because the motherboards utilizing the 31/33/35 chipset that use a 4 layer PCB don't work with 45nM CPU's.
This by itself is very unusual and noteworthy. Considering that is what this chipset was made for. And what about the people that bought said mb's for the 45nM cpus......
[
Posted by: OldDummy

|
Date: 12/26/07 05:48:27 AM]
2.
Take your time intel. The world is yours.
[
Posted by: Mr. BonBon

|
Date: 12/20/07 09:10:31 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
That's right... take your time and get lazy like you did with Netburst B-)
[
Posted by: cheeseman

|
Date: 12/20/07 12:48:10 PM]
3.
should we blame hector for this as well?
[
Posted by: havierys

|
Date: 12/20/07 01:09:16 PM]
4.
fuck this shit... , but I do not care... I will probably still buy amd... I am not here to spend more than $75 on a processor
[
Posted by: 31415

|
Date: 12/20/07 06:29:47 PM]
5.
this cant be true anyway, because they are already selling core 2 extremes with exactly the same specifications (also yorkfield core) so the "problems" have to be under control
[
Posted by: cartman

|
Date: 12/21/07 03:50:44 AM]
6.
I'm not surprised here.
They have nothing to worry about from AMD.
This delay is again AMD fault for slaggin' round
[
Posted by: huh

|
Date: 12/21/07 05:23:46 AM]
7.
Nice move INTEL!!!
Take your time!! Just launch your better product when AMD is set to launch another crappy product!!!
This way we can continue to bash AMD fanboys worldwide!!!
[
Posted by: I like bashing AMD fanboys

|
Date: 12/21/07 06:33:02 AM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)
- collapse thread
anyway, i guess that's just an example of what will happen to US ALL "consumers" if there wasn't a healthy competition between processor manufacturers.
AMD fan boy, or Intel fan boy, or even a bashing fan boy .. all should be sad as right now only intel controls the market by:
[1] type of products "fast/ super fast/better than AMD"
[2] release dates, no hurry, even if it will
[3] prices as clearly AMD is having trouble lowering their prices, even with crappy products
[
Posted by: you must be kidding right?!

|
Date: 12/21/07 03:49:08 PM]
BS!
You call this competition?!? AMD couldn't even come up with a chip that can perform marginally well in half of those benchmarks...
A true competitor should be able to beat its competitors is some aspects... the current AMD lineup is a mudslide!
Just because Intel's CORE architecture is a solid design and it leads most benchmarks, you fanboys blame them for monopoly! Wake up and tell AMD to stop screwing around!
[
Posted by: WHHAAATTT

|
Date: 12/26/07 04:33:54 PM]
8.
Well, we can't have it both ways:
Camp1: Hey, who needs quad core anyhow? Almost everything out there is written for dual core or less. My 2002 (2003, 2004, 2005, 2006) era system still does just fine, thank you very much.
Camp2: Give me more cores, faster cores, better cores!! I can always use more power. Gimme gimme gimme!!
Dear Intel: Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
[
Posted by: mark1

|
Date: 12/23/07 08:38:13 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Penryn avaliable for sale have no cache error so delay if any is a business decision
I hope people walke up and stop supporting this idiotic hobby
[
Posted by: gertiatric smell

|
Date: 12/27/07 07:00:08 AM]
9.
That's funny they call it a delay, I bought an HP machine with an Intel Quadcore last month. It works great.
[
Posted by: Carl

|
Date: 01/21/08 10:03:27 PM]
[1-9]