News

Advanced Micro Devices, the troubled maker of x86 central processing units (CPUs), is projected to face further delay of its highly-anticipated AMD Phenom microprocessors and will only be in position to supply them in Q2 2008. This setback is likely to have a negative financial impact on the company’s financial results in the first quarter of 2008.

After a Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB)-related erratum was discovered in AMD Phenom microprocessors and AMD had to impose a fix that reduced performance of the CPUs, Advanced Micro Devices had to announce a new B3 stepping of the chip with bug corrected without performance degradation. Unfortunately for AMD, the new chips will only become available for its customers sometime in Q2 2008, not in Q1 2008, as expected, according to AMD’s production schedule published by HKEPC web-site.

Quad-core AMD Phenom 9900, 9700, 9650, 9550, 9150e and 9100e chips are scheduled to be commercially available in the second quarter, 2008, whereas development samples of the chips are generally projected to be available for AMD’s customers in the first quarter of the year. Triple-core AMD Phenom 8700, 8650 and 8450 chips are also projected to be available in Q2 2008; still, AMD Phenom 8600 and 8400 – which are based on the B2 stepping with TLB errata – will be released commercially in March, 2008.

Despite of stepping change, the new quad-core microprocessors by AMD will only run at clock-speeds 2.60GHz and below, whereas triple-core chips will only operate at 2.40GHz and lower.

The delay of the advanced AMD Phenom microprocessors to Q2 2008 will slowdown AMD’s revenue growth in the first quarter, as currently available AMD Athlon 64 X2 processors are not competitive against higher-end Intel Core 2 chips and the world’s second largest x86 processor maker will have to concentrate on selling primarily lower-end CPUs that have low profit margins.

Advanced Micro Devices did not comment on the news-story.

Discussion

Comments currently: 19
Discussion started: 12/27/07 11:07:57 AM
Latest comment: 01/02/08 10:22:50 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-6]

1. 
Too bad, I was hoping AMD could deliver, not that I'm an AMD fan, but it would have kept Intel on their toes. Notice how rumors of Intel delaying their 45 nano chips are starting to fly.
[Posted by: Joe  | Date: 12/27/07 11:07:57 AM]

2. 
I absolutely do not care that Phenom is delayed, in the sense that I was never going to buy one... They are junk.... A Q6600 owns them badly, especially when overclocked, something Phenom can't do worth a $*@!

What I do care about, is a lack of competition, allowing intel to screw around, which is exactly what they seam to be doing now =0
[Posted by: gamebro  | Date: 12/27/07 12:07:04 PM]

3. 
Alright!!! way to go AMD!!! how about delaying it forever!?!
[Posted by: anti-"AMD Fanboy"  | Date: 12/27/07 12:43:54 PM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)

4. 
AMD doing their namesake honor again:

Another Mayor Delay.

How the heck do they managed against Intell for so long.
One of the greatest Mysteries in Life
[Posted by: huh  | Date: 12/27/07 03:11:51 PM]
+ expand thread (9 answers)

5. 
Software workarounds will always provide penalties even though engineers try their hardest not to have any performance penalties. The correct way, is fix the problem in hardware. If this can not be done, trash it and move on to the next model, but do not forget problems that happened in the past.

I think AMD should trash this core and move the R&D team to the next core release, so the next core release can come out on time or sooner. Before the next core release, AMD should create a revised version of the X2 processor to include SSE5 instruction set, SDK to help programmers convert to SSE5 easily and at the same time include backwards capability to SSE3, use 65 nm fabrication process, and provide extreme over clocking close to 4 GHz or higher.
[Posted by: linunerd  | Date: 12/29/07 01:06:04 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

6. 
It's a shame.

It's been over six months now that we keep hearing nothing but bad news of AMD.

Without AMD there will be no competition, and I fear AMD's chances of survival are becoming lower and lower day by day...

God help AMD (and me :) ).
[Posted by: Erez  | Date: 12/31/07 12:11:10 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

[1-6]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS