News

Advanced Micro Devices, the world’s second largest producer of x86 microprocessors, confirmed in an interview at Consumer Electronics Show that its AMD Phenom central processing units (CPUs) with four processing engines with performance higher than that of currently available chips will be delayed and will emerge only in the second quarter.

AMD publicly stated late last year to its customers, journalists as well as financial analysts that it would be able to offer quad-core AMD Phenom 9700 and 9900 microprocessors with fixed erratum as well as at higher clock-speeds in Q1 2008, which would allow the chipmaker to target higher price-points with new products and ultimately improve its profit margins. Unfortunately, this is not going to happen, as undisclosed AMD representatives said in an interview with Ars Technica web-site that the new Phenom chips are now only scheduled for the introduction in Q2 2008.

Instead of releasing high-performance AMD Phenom microprocessors in the first quarter, AMD will offer certain energy-efficient microprocessors based on the new-generation micro-architecture with lowered power consumption. Earlier it was reported based on unofficial information that AMD will be able to offer quad-core Phenom 9100e chip (1.80GHz) as well as triple-core Phenom 8600 and 8400 – which are all based on the B2 stepping with TLB errata –commercially in March, 2008.

It remains to be seen whether the delay of mainstream AMD Phenom 9700 and 9900 microprocessors also automatically means postpones for higher-speed models, including AMD Phenom FX models. Previously the new enthusiast-class FX chips from AMD were projected to become available “in the first half of the year”, which usually means late second quarter. However, with postponement of the mainstream-class chips it seems doubtful that AMD manages to increase clock-speeds of the new version of its AMD Phenom processors shortly after the launch of the models 9700 and 9900.

The delay of the advanced AMD Phenom microprocessors to Q2 2008 will slowdown AMD’s revenue growth in the first quarter, as currently available AMD Athlon 64 X2 processors are not competitive against higher-end Intel Core 2 chips and the world’s second largest x86 processor maker will have to concentrate on selling primarily lower-end CPUs that have low profit margins.

Discussion

Comments currently: 11
Discussion started: 01/11/08 06:58:32 AM
Latest comment: 03/08/08 05:31:30 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-8]

1. 
The ship is sinking slowly...

They better have good pumps.
[Posted by: AnnThraXX  | Date: 01/11/08 06:58:32 AM]

2. 
Im not gonna be surprised when a private person buys AMD considering its on sale almost 4free
[Posted by: 1234  | Date: 01/11/08 07:32:56 AM]

3. 
I think AMD needs to do two things.

1) fix the TLB bug and put out new CPU's NOW. They really need to concentrate on this ASAP it dosen't make sense to keep shipping CPU's with this bug and they should instead discount these chips as faster triple core CPUs once they have new CPU's without the TLB bug.

2) Let ATI do it's thing. AMD really needs to let their graphic devision be competitive with NVidia. Ever since ATI got bought by AMD their strategy has changed for the worse and forcing these platform launches with a Graphics Card is fine when your ahead, but when you're behind you need to let the Graphics Devision do what it needs to do in order to climb back to the top, and more importantly to become profitable once again.
[Posted by: Megamanx00  | Date: 01/11/08 02:01:09 PM]

4. 
This isnt bad for AMD if you loook at the facts.

Fact #1: Phenom 2.3 black edition priced at $239 overclocks to 2.8-2.9 gigs. That beats the crap out of the Q6700 at $550.

Fact #2: the Acers and HPs of the world value power efficiency more than pushing more gigahertz.

Fact #3: AMD pulled in the energy efficient chips from Q2 to Q1 a good tradeoff.
[Posted by: truthseeker33  | Date: 01/12/08 07:03:14 AM]
+ expand thread (3 answers)

5. 
I'd just love to know what's going on behind the curtains. The Phenom has been delayed one too many times and its performance is unusually low for a chip with 4 cores. The B3 revision better be worth the wait.
[Posted by: fastpunk  | Date: 01/12/08 02:02:49 PM]

6. 
These 'new' AMD quads will be competing with (IF/when they are ever released) the newer Intel Penryn/Wolfdale 45nm cores with performance far superior to Phenom

I seriously hope AMD can drastically cut the power draw needed by Phenom (65nm) because at the moment Intels 45nm cores are only using a fraction (wattage) of what is needed by Phenom
[Posted by: alpha0ne  | Date: 01/13/08 09:31:13 PM]

7. 
As I was always expecting this!!

Keep it up!!

[Posted by: anti-\  | Date: 01/13/08 10:59:19 PM]

8. 
Trying to remain loyal to AMD is trying
[Posted by: Dan  | Date: 03/08/08 05:31:30 PM]

[1-8]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS