News
 

Bookmark and Share

(4) 

Despite of expectations, Intel Corp.’s microprocessors for desktops with dramatically reduced power consumption will feature form-factor developed for mobile computers. Therefore, the new chips will require mainboards featuring appropriate sockets.

Last week it was reported that the first breed of 35W chips for high-performance desktops made using 45nm process technology will be released already this month, whereas additional chips will be added into family on the 28th of December. The family of ultra low-power chips for desktop computers will include both dual-core and quad-core central processing units, which are projected to be compatible with desktop mainboards featuring mobile sockets infrastructure.

“The T-and P-series CPUs are not LGA775 compatible, they are mobile sockets,” an Intel spokesperson said.

As a result, system integrators or end-users looking forward high-performance dual-core or quad-core central processing units (CPUs) with 35W thermal envelope will have to use FCPGA6 infrastructure for desktops, which automatically increases pricing of such solutions.

Tags: Intel, Core, 45nm

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 11/24/08 03:08:54 PM
Latest comment: 11/25/08 11:42:29 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-3]

1. 
Speaking of correction, the QX9300 and Q9100 have 45W, not 35W.
That's probably true for the other Quads, too.

http://processorfinder.in.../details.aspx?sSpec=SLB5J
http://processorfinder.in.../details.aspx?sSpec=SLB5G
0 0 [Posted by: Bingle  | Date: 11/24/08 03:08:54 PM]
Reply

2. 
I don't know about the quads, but the TDP for the P chips (e.g. P8400) should be corrected to 25W.
0 0 [Posted by: yehuda  | Date: 11/25/08 07:26:24 AM]
Reply

3. 
http://www.newegg.com/Pro...p;Depa=1&Order=PRICED
http://en.wikipedia.org/w...cessors#Mobile_processors


Core 2 Duo Pxxxx series 25W confirmed. Quad Core 45W confirmed
FWIW I would rather have a ULV-C2D at 10W and 1.2-1.4GHz with a low-power chipset than a dual-core 5W Atom.
0 0 [Posted by: cheeseman  | Date: 11/25/08 09:26:07 AM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
FWIW I would rather have a ULV-C2D at 10W and 1.2-1.4GHz with a low-power chipset than a dual-core 5W Atom.

I would make it dependable on price and DVI out
0 0 [Posted by: Bingle  | Date: 11/25/08 11:42:29 AM]
Reply

[1-3]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Thursday, August 21, 2014

10:59 pm | Khronos Group to Follow DirectX 12 with Cross-Platform Low-Level API. Khronos Unveils Next-Generation OpenGL Initiative

10:33 pm | Avexir Readies 3.40GHz DDR4 Memory Modules. DDR4 Could Hit 3.40GHz This Year

12:10 pm | AMD to Lower Prices of A-Series APUs for Back-to-School Season. New Prices of AMD A-Series APUs Revealed

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

10:53 am | AMD to Cut Prices on FX-9000, Other FX Processors: New Prices Revealed. AMD to Make FX Chips More Affordable, Discontinue Low-End Models

10:32 am | LG to Introduce World’s First Curved 21:9 Ultra-Wide Display. LG Brings Curved Displays to Gamers, Professionals

9:59 am | AMD Readies FX-8370, FX-8370E Microprocessors. AMD Preps Two New “Mainstream” FX Chips