News

 

Bookmark and Share

(1) 

The state of New York has filed a lawsuit against Intel Corp. accusing the chip giant of paying billions of dollars to computer makers in order to discourage them from using microprocessors by Advanced Micro Devices. Dell alone allegedly received $6 billion dollars between 2002 and 2007 and sometimes those payments exceeded Dell’s profits.

The lawsuit alleges Intel paid computer makers, including IBM and HP, to discourage them from utilizing microprocessors produced by Intel’s arch-rival AMD, reports Dow Jones Newswires. For example, as a part of the agreement, Intel compensated below-cost bids against rivals offering AMD-based desktops, servers or workstations by Dell in order to slowdown the increase of AMD’s market share. 

Under a secret pact named the "Mother of all Programs", Intel paid Dell a rebate based on the total cost of central processing units the computer maker bought, the lawsuit claims. The percentage of the rebate could fluctuate, but reached up to 16% as Dell mulled over using AMD processors. Moreover, in one fiscal quarter Intel’s payments constituted 116% of Dell's reported net income, according to the lawsuit.

Intel has already faced similar lawsuits in Europe, Japan, South Korea and the U.S., therefore, the current accusations hardly change the situation drastically.

Dell, HP and Dell declined to comment, but Intel added that it would defend itself. IBM said it would co-operate with the investigation.

Tags: Intel, AMD, Business, Dell, HP, IBM

Discussion

Comments currently: 1
Discussion started: 11/08/09 04:53:24 AM
Latest comment: 11/08/09 04:53:24 AM

[1-1]

1. 
Of course they game the money. AMD continuously had the better CPU solution during this period. It was more performant, cooler and cheaper. Why wouldn't the world's greatest PC manufacturer use them? Especially between the Athlon64 launch when Intel was dwarfed by AMD's CPUs and the beginning of 2007 when the Core 2 Duo shipments ramped up.

I was perpetually amazed that AMD had the BEST CPU out there for 1 year, then 2 years, then 3 years ... but they never gained serious market share. If ATi would have the better GPU, the balance would immediately change in its favor from 40 / 60 to 60 / 40 . This never happened with Intel and AMD .
[Posted by: East17  | Date: 11/08/09 04:53:24 AM]

[1-1]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Friday, July 30, 2010

5:03 pm | Microsoft Wants Badly to Be Competitive in Tablets. Microsoft Works to "Make Windows 7 Happen on Slates"

3:47 pm | Nvidia Researching Image Tracking, Motion Detection Technologies – Company. Nvidia May Enable Real-Time Motion Detection on GPUs Eventually

Thursday, July 29, 2010

11:10 pm | Fujitsu and Toshiba Sign Official Agreement to Merge Mobile Phone Business Units. Fujitsu and Toshiba Merge Mobile Phone Businesses

10:17 pm | TSMC Boosts 40nm Revenue by 30% in the Second Quarter. TSMC Reports Record Revenues for Q2 2010

3:25 pm | Intel to Start Revenue Shipments of Next-Generation Desktop Platform in October. Intel to Start Shipments of New Core-Logic Sets to Mainboard Makers in October

2:00 pm | Nintendo to Reveal Price and Release Date of 3DS in Late September. Nintendo Preps to Unveil Launch Information for 3DS

11:47 am | ATI Commands Markets of High-End, Mainstream Graphics Cards - Research. Nvidia Continues to Lead the Desktop Graphics Market in Terms of Volume

11:45 am | Sales of Blu-Ray Media Climbs as Sales of Players Slows Down in Europe, Japan. Market of Blu-Ray and DVD Players Begins to Stagnate

9:53 am | ATI Steals Market Share from Nvidia Due to World-Class DirectX 11 Strategy Execution. ATI Becomes World's Largest Supplier of Discrete Graphics Chips