News
 

Bookmark and Share

(3) 

Intel Corp. has confirmed plans to release ten-core microprocessor for servers based on the code-named Westmere micro-architecture. The chip is likely to be released next year and Intel will disclose details about it this August.

On the 24th of August, 2010, the world’s largest maker of central processing units will reveal details about its ten-core chip code-named Westmere-EX at the Hot Chips conference. At present only rumours exist about the microprocessor and the program of the symposium is the first official confirmation that the chip exists in plans. Regrettably, Intel did not reveal any additional information about the chip in the description of its presentation.

At present Intel sells eight-core Xeon MP microprocessor originally code-named Nehalem-EX. It is noteworthy that the chip emerged about one and a half years after the original Nehalem processor for high-end desktops and dual-chip servers, whereas Westmere-EX is likely to emerge sometime in the first half of 2011, about a year after the first Westmere chip code-named Gulftown.

The ten-core Westmere microprocessor will be able to process up to twenty threads of code at once thanks to Hyper-Threading technology. It will also support such capabilities as AES-NI, which improves performance in security applications. The chip will be made using 32nm fabrication process.

Even though ten processing engines is a remarkable number, the arch-rival of Intel – Advanced Micro Devices – will release server chips with up to sixteen cores based on the new code-named Bulldozer micro-architecture next year. While at present Intel’s multi-processor server platform offers a number of advantages compared to AMD’s it remains to be seen whether those advantages will be enough to compete against sixteen-core chips using a ten-core CPU in 2011.

Tags: , Intel, , Bulldozer, Westmere, 32nm, AMD

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 06/22/10 02:50:25 PM
Latest comment: 06/24/10 05:13:28 AM

[1-3]

1. 
Wa
0 0 [Posted by: bdcrazy  | Date: 06/22/10 02:50:25 PM]
Reply

2. 
On the 10 v 16 thing, you have to remember that it is:

10 HT-capable cores / 20 Threads (single die)

vs.

8 modules / 16 "cores" (fp shared more than int) / 16 threads (dual die MCM: 2 x 4-module-die)

Calling one BD module 2 "cores" is somewhat of a stretch. It's a sort of hybrid between 1 and 2 cores.


0 0 [Posted by: chipper  | Date: 06/23/10 02:21:00 PM]
Reply

3. 
According to wikipedia "but the operating system will see each module as two physical cores". So like HT the OS sees 2 for one core.
0 0 [Posted by: christophergorge  | Date: 06/24/10 05:13:28 AM]
Reply

[1-3]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Monday, August 4, 2014

4:04 pm | HGST Shows-Off World’s Fastest SSD Based on PCM Memory. Phase-Change Memory Power’s World’s Fastest Solid-State Drive

Monday, July 28, 2014

6:02 pm | Microsoft’s Mobile Strategy Seem to Fail: Sales of Lumia and Surface Remain Low. Microsoft Still Cannot Make Windows a Popular Mobile Platform

12:11 pm | Intel Core i7-5960X “Haswell-E” De-Lidded: Twelve Cores and Alloy-Based Thermal Interface. Intel Core i7-5960X Uses “Haswell-EP” Die, Promises Good Overclocking Potential

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones