News
 

Bookmark and Share

(2) 

Without getting substantial updates for years, Intel Corp.’s Celeron lineup continues to provide better performance compared to Intel Atom central processing units thanks to Core 2-based micro-architecture. But sometimes later in 2010 or even early in 2010 its manufacturer does have plans to breathe a new micro-architecture into Celeron chips.

“We will not take [32nm process technology and appropriate micro-architecture] down into the Pentium and Celeron until either late this year or early next year,” said Paul Otellini, chief executive officer of Intel, during a recent conversation with financial analysts.

At present there vast majority of Intel’s 32nm processors belong to Core i family of chips, there is one Pentium chip and recently Intel also started to list several Celeron models based on the Arrandale/Clarkdale chips that are made using the latest fabrication process. Unfortunately, the company itself does not advertize those chips substantially and usually they can only be found in select machines by select manufacturers.

At present Celeron-branded microprocessors account for 5% - 6% volume of desktop chips by the Intel, the remaining volume is commanded by various Core i, Core 2, Pentium and even Atom microprocessors, which clearly shows that Celeron family is hardly popular.

Considering the fact that demand towards advanced chips produced at 32nm node is high at the moment, it is unlikely that Intel will truly initiate the process of upgrading the Celeron cores since the same production capacities can be utilized to produce more advanced and expensive products.

Tags: Intel, Celeron, Arrandale, Clarkdale, 32nm, Pentium

Discussion

Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 07/15/10 06:20:58 AM
Latest comment: 07/28/10 08:43:56 AM

[1-2]

1. 
...which clearly shows that Celeron family is hardly popular.

Of course it is not popular. There are no more gems like 300A any more. I guess Intel learn it's lesson.
0 0 [Posted by: jonup  | Date: 07/15/10 06:20:58 AM]
Reply

2. 
Why do we need Celeron processors any more? Were they not just defective chips sold as Celeron insted of being scrapped?
As far as i can remember Intel have a list of chips which are not hacked up and saved from the scrap pile. Probably wrong.
0 0 [Posted by: markpc  | Date: 07/28/10 08:43:56 AM]
Reply

[1-2]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Friday, May 17, 2013

11:50 pm | Sales of Nintendo Wii U Hit Another Low in the U.S. Nintendo Wii U Just Cannot Become Popular

Thursday, May 16, 2013

11:41 pm | Dell Admits Windows 8 Did Not Meet Expectations, Pins Hopes on “Blue” Updates. Dell Disappointed with Windows 8, But Believes in the Future

10:59 pm | AMD Needs More Than Game Console Design Wins to Offset PC Market Declines – Analysts. AMD Has to Develop Competitive Product Lineup to Survive in Current Environment

10:33 pm | Corning Introduces Corning Lotus XT Glass for High-Performance Displays. Corning Advances Glass Substrate for High-Performance Displays

9:51 pm | True Stereo-3D Will Require 330MP – 3.3GP Resolutions, Says Developer of 8K Video Format. NHK: 8K Is the Final 2D Format, All Future Formats Will Be in 3D

9:41 pm | Innodisk Begins to Ship DDR4 RDIMM Samples to Server Makers. Independent DIMM Supplier Samples DDR4 RDIMMs

8:56 pm | Samsung Develops 45nm Embedded Flash Logic Process Technology. Samsung Successfully Tests 45nm Embedded Flash Logic Manufacturing Tech

7:57 pm | NHK Shows World’s First 8K Movie at Cannes Film Festival. Japanese National Broadcasting Company Demos 8K Movie, Content to Film Industry

7:27 pm | Intel’s Paul Otellini: Lack of Chip for iPhone, iPad Was My Worst Mistake. Intel’s Outgoing CEO Regrets About Mission Opportunities with Apple iOS