News
 

Bookmark and Share

(6) 

Advanced Micro Devices has had major issues with the 32nm silicon-on-insulator process technology. As a result of those problems, the yields of the company's code-named Llano accelerated processing units (APUs) were so low that the company had to delay them by many months. Besides, those problems affected release schedule of next-gen Bulldozer micro-processors. But the issues seem to be largely behind AMD.

"We had been having slow kind of ramp of the yield curve [with 32nm SOI]. [...] I can tell you today that we are now [on the ramp take off part] of the yield curve. Our 32nm is healthy and it is ramping up to support our product launches next year," said Chekib Akrout, senior vice president of technology group at AMD, during the company's conference with financial analysts.

As previously reported, AMD currently promises its partners to start mass production of its eight-core code-named Zambezi processor for desktops using 32nm SOI fabrication process in April, 2011. The chip will be not only AMD's first central processing unit made using 32nm SOI at Globalfoundries, but it will be the first processor based on the highly-anticipated Bulldozer micro-architecture. The Zambezi product will be released to market in Q2, according to Mr. Akrout, whereas its server brethren will see the light of the day in Q3 2011.

Meanwhile, according to sources familiar with AMD Llano launch schedule, the company will only obtain engineering samples of Llano that it can provide to partners in March, 2011, and will have production candidate in June next year. The firm currently plans to start mass production of Llano in July, 2011.

The fact that AMD and Globalfoundries have solved the problems with 32nm technology process is a good news for AMD as products made using the latest fabrication tech should not only improve competitive position of the company against Intel Corp., but also prove the feasibility of the acquisition of ATI Technologies back in 2006.

Unfortunately for AMD, the company's manufacturer will only start mass production of 32nm chips about 1.5 years behind Intel Corp. and only about six months before the world's largest maker of chips starts to manufacture processors at 22nm node.

Tags: AMD, Zambezi, Llano, 32nm, Globalfoundries, Orochi, Valencia, Bulldozer, Radeon, Fusion, Semiconductor

Discussion

Comments currently: 6
Discussion started: 11/11/10 06:56:57 PM
Latest comment: 11/14/10 02:33:42 PM

[1-6]

1. 
Contrary, GloFo has been always talking she had no problems with 32nm SOI.
0 0 [Posted by: Azazel  | Date: 11/11/10 06:56:57 PM]
Reply

2. 
This is very complex stuff, it could have been at various steps.
Maybe the Production-Chain, or tweaking a few steps.
I think it isn´t the 32nm-SOI itself.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 11/12/10 04:46:17 AM]
Reply

3. 
amd is laggin behind badly, intel is going 22nm while amd is gonna be at 32nm.
0 0 [Posted by: 3Dkiller  | Date: 11/12/10 06:25:38 PM]
Reply

4. 
I do feel that AMD just talking these days even about Radeon products.
AMD has left behind both Intel and NVIDIA
0 0 [Posted by: Pouria  | Date: 11/13/10 03:52:06 AM]
Reply

5. 
intel's ramp up of a new production node has historically always been very slow, with the majority of its products still on the previous process even 3 quarters after it introduces products on the new node.

AMD on the other hand has always has a quick ramp up, a legacy of their 1 factory history, producing almost nothing but the new node 1 quarter later.

add to that the performance of bulldozer. which, according to AMD, can get 180% of the performance of a dual core with only 12.5% more die space then a single core.
if true, or even if the performance figures are half true, that enough to negate intel's node advantage, at-least from a cost perspective.

so plenty of room for AMD to sell their products, especially now that OEM's are finally on board with AMD too, with the US court case settled in AMD's favour and Intel reprimanded multiple times in Europe and Asia.
0 0 [Posted by: Countess  | Date: 11/13/10 04:54:03 AM]
Reply

6. 
[quote]with the US court case settled in AMD's favour and Intel reprimanded multiple times in Europe and Asia.
[/quote]

Yeah .. but we already lost nVIDIA as an intel victim.
0 0 [Posted by: East17  | Date: 11/14/10 02:33:42 PM]
Reply

[1-6]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

6:11 am | Apple Teams Up with IBM to Make iPhone and iPad Ultimate Tools for Businesses and Enterprises. IBM to Sell Business-Optimized iPhone and iPad Devices

Monday, July 14, 2014

6:01 am | IBM to Invest $3 Billion In Research of Next-Gen Chips, Process Technologies. IBM to Fund Development of 7nm and Below Process Technologies, Help to Create Post-Silicon Future

5:58 am | Intel Postpones Launch of High-End “Broadwell-K” Processors to July – September, 2015. High-End Core i “Broadwell” Processors Scheduled to Arrive in Q3 2015

5:50 am | Intel Delays Introduction of Core M “Broadwell” Processors Further. Low-Power Broadwell Chips Due in Late 2014

Wednesday, July 9, 2014

4:04 pm | Intel Readies New Quark “Dublin Bay” Microprocessors. Intel’s “Dublin Bay” Chips Due in 2015