News
 

Bookmark and Share

(8) 

Every new generation of central processing units (CPUs) brings improved performance as well as enhanced set of features. Some generations bring breakthrough changes to computing and some just pass some incremental benefits. According to Intel Corp.'s chief executive officer, the next-generation Core i "Sandy Bridge" chips will bring improvements analogous to what the Pentium was compared to 80486 back in 1993.

"The Sandy Bridge is a 486 to Pentium kind of jump. What the Pentium did was enable the beginning of the multimedia (computing) era by virtues of capabilities built into it. It was the right product at the right time. We are now about to move to the era of visualization - we may be in the middle of that movement today- where everything is about video whether it is consumer or corporate. It is going to be about not just watching video, but sharing video and video conferencing. [...] What this product was engineered for was the optimized video visual experience," said Paul Otellini, chief executive officer and president of Intel, during his speech at COMDEXvirtual.

As is known, Intel Core i "Sandy Bridge" processors, which will be officially launched on the 5th of January, 2011, at the Consumer Electronics Show, integrate highly improved graphics processing core that can compete against entry-level discrete graphics cards. Intel failed to create a competitive standalone graphics processor and had to substantially boost performance of Sandy Bridge's graphics core to provide proper performance in modern multimedia applications and also jump onto the GPGPU bandwagon kick started by ATI (AMD) and Nvidia several years ago.

"I think that things that would take you minutes to do on our latest [Core i 2010] chip that we are shipping today will be seconds on Sandy Bridge in terms of video compression. It really is a revolution in this (video) area. And when you look at the integration of the graphics (on a single chip) it just makes it even better," added Mr. Otellini.

Intel has already initiated mass production of Sandy Bridge family of microprocessors and has also started to ship the chips for revenue.

The first Intel Sandy Bridge chips will feature two or four cores with Turbo Boost and Hyper-Threading technology as well as integrated graphics processor that will actually be on the same die as the x86 cores, according to previous reports. There will be a lot of different desktop models with 35W, 65W (dual-core, quad-core) or 95W (quad-core) thermal design power. The new processors will use LGA1155 form-factor and will only be compatible with platforms based on the Intel 6-series chipsets.

The two key improvements of Sandy Bridge are a new integrated graphics core with much increased performance as well as Intel AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) technology which, when used by software programmers, will increase performance in floating point, media, and processor intensive software, according to the Intel. Key features of Intel AVX include wider vectors, increasing from 128 bit to 256 bit wide, resulting in up to 2x peak FLOPs output; enhanced data rearrangement, resulting in allowing data to be pulled more efficiently, and three operand, non-destructive syntax for a range of benefits. Intel AVX can also increase energy efficiency beyond the increases brought by the micro-architectural innovations, and is backwards compatible to existing Intel processors.

Thanks to much improved performance of built-in graphics core of Sandy Bridge, system makers will be able to drop low-end integrated graphics from ATI or Nvidia, which will reduce their costs and will boost profitability. Analyst also expect high-speed integrated graphics to dramatically affect the market of entry-level standalone graphics cards.

Tags: Intel, Core, Pentium, 32nm

Discussion

Comments currently: 8
Discussion started: 11/17/10 09:24:56 PM
Latest comment: 05/24/11 10:21:54 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-5]

1. 
Just useless hype. Intel's graphics will never be better then what ATi has prepared in their Fusion line. Also, usualy an INTEL platform is much more expensive than what AMD has on the market at any given time so the 2 points touched upon by Paul Fagottiny are null : the platform won't be cheaper than AMD's and the video chip won't be more advanced than AMD's. Maybe the combination between the CPU power and video power will be overall interesting but you can bet 110% that they'll be more expensive.
0 0 [Posted by: East17  | Date: 11/17/10 09:24:56 PM]
Reply

2. 
You got to make those fools pay for upgrades. Sandy Bridge looks like an awesome processor but i doubt all those people on high clocked C2D/i5/i7/X4/X6 quads and sixcore processors will give in to the upgrade scratch. For new buyers it will be awesome, for old pc upgrades, best wait 3-4 months for AMDs Bulldozer cores to arrive and then decide.
0 0 [Posted by: bereft  | Date: 11/17/10 11:18:18 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
The new AMD cpus work with AM3+ only, so looks like you'll have to buy a new motherboard.

This arguement that AMD people get to upgrade their cpu without a new motherboard is so retarded unless you like tiny upgrades because of the fact they release a new socket every year, with only 1 level of backwards compatibility, except zambezi wont even have that 1 level of backwards compatibility...
Intel has had 1156 for 2 years, there will be no compatibility with 1155. Both people are requiring upgrades.
0 0 [Posted by: cashkennedy  | Date: 11/18/10 10:10:59 AM]
Reply

3. 
The original 60 & 66 MHz Pentium processors were quickly replaced by 90, 120, and 133 MHz variants that were much faster. So my advice is to wait for Ivy Bridge and the 22 nm process that will be much better than Sandy Bridge. Plus there won't be much (if any) software that make use of the special features of the new chips. Intel is just trying to hype a new product.
0 0 [Posted by:  | Date: 11/18/10 12:58:22 PM]
Reply
- collapse thread

 
I thought the original 60 & 66mhz Pentium Pro's were superceded by the 90 and 100 mhz variants. I don't remember them being replaced quickly however. The original Pentiums were a quantum leap ahead of 486's.
0 0 [Posted by: davmat787  | Date: 12/04/10 08:55:49 AM]
Reply

4. 
Then bulldozer will be what we liken as K7 - K10.5
0 0 [Posted by: DJDestiny  | Date: 12/09/10 08:07:47 AM]
Reply

5. 
As I recall, the original Pentiums at 60 or 66 MHz were outclassed by the triple-clocked DX4 100 MHz on typical applications available at the time.
0 0 [Posted by: alpaca  | Date: 05/24/11 10:21:54 AM]
Reply

[1-5]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones

Monday, July 21, 2014

10:32 pm | PQI Debuts Flash Drive with Lightning and USB Connectors. PQI Offers Easy Way to Boost iPhone or iPad Storage

10:08 pm | Japan Display Begins to Mass Produce IPS-NEO Displays. JDI Begins to Mass Produce Rival for AMOLED Panels

12:56 pm | Microsoft to Fire 18,000 Employees to Boost Efficiency. Microsoft to Perform Massive Job Cut Ever Following Acquisition of Nokia