News
 

Bookmark and Share

(4) 

An overclocker has managed to rather substantially increase the world's frequency record for Advanced Micro Devices' central processing units (CPU) at an overclocking contest hosted by Gigabyte Technologies, one of the largest makers of mainboards.

Utilizing Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD7 mainboard, the overclocker who calls himself Mad222 from Hong Kong managed to overclock AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition processor (3.40GHz) to whopping 7344.48MHz. The computer performance enthusiast used dry ice for cooling. The mainboard was not modified, according to the overclocking.

Based on the "hall of fame" of validated CPU-Z overclocking records, Mad222 substantially increased the overclocking bar for any AMD microprocessor with 7344.48MHz clock-speed as the others are rather substantially behind the leader with 7217.81MHz (Phenom II X4 955), 7153.89MHz (Phenom II X4 955), 7140.39MHz (Phenom II X4 955) and 7127.85MHz (Phenom II X4 955). Gigabyte also claims that two other overclockers, who participated in the contest and used Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD7 mainboards managed to hit 7182.04MHz and 7168.7MHz clock-speeds.

Overclocking microprocessors by almost 100% from their official frequency is not truly uncommon in the world of hardcore overclockers. However, when overclocked, those chips can barely perform any actual job and usually overclockers only run SuperPi test suite. Moreover, systems cooled down using liquid nitrogen or other extreme methods cannot be used for prolonged periods of time. As a result, overclocking records are just records and do not have a lot of practical meaning other than showing reliability of CPUs, mainboards and/or other components.

The world's highest CPU frequency ever reached is 8242.45MHz. The record was set using Intel Celeron 360 microprocessor and Asus Commando mainboard.

Tags: AMD, Phenom, Deneb

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 02/17/11 08:47:07 AM
Latest comment: 02/18/11 10:04:02 AM

[1-4]

1. 
If Intel had stuck with NetBurst, anyone could have that in their homes. No performance though, but still.
0 0 [Posted by: Harry Lloyd  | Date: 02/17/11 08:47:07 AM]
Reply

2. 
NetBurst was a complete failure exactly because it failed to scale in clockspeed despite being built to specifically do so.


Over 100% OC and another raise in the record for AMD chips, not bad at all.
0 0 [Posted by: DIREWOLF75  | Date: 02/17/11 09:38:44 AM]
Reply

3. 
Lol ,Congrat to AMD .One and only AMD ;p
0 0 [Posted by: Blackcode  | Date: 02/17/11 12:30:10 PM]
Reply

4. 
It's quite a bit harder to get 4 cores up to that speed than a single core.
0 0 [Posted by: bbo320  | Date: 02/18/11 10:04:02 AM]
Reply

[1-4]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Monday, August 4, 2014

4:04 pm | HGST Shows-Off World’s Fastest SSD Based on PCM Memory. Phase-Change Memory Power’s World’s Fastest Solid-State Drive

Monday, July 28, 2014

6:02 pm | Microsoft’s Mobile Strategy Seem to Fail: Sales of Lumia and Surface Remain Low. Microsoft Still Cannot Make Windows a Popular Mobile Platform

12:11 pm | Intel Core i7-5960X “Haswell-E” De-Lidded: Twelve Cores and Alloy-Based Thermal Interface. Intel Core i7-5960X Uses “Haswell-EP” Die, Promises Good Overclocking Potential

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

10:40 pm | ARM Preps Second-Generation “Artemis” and “Maya” 64-Bit ARMv8-A Offerings. ARM Readies 64-Bit Cores for Non-Traditional Applications

7:38 pm | AMD Vows to Introduce 20nm Products Next Year. AMD’s 20nm APUs, GPUs and Embedded Chips to Arrive in 2015

4:08 am | Microsoft to Unify All Windows Operating Systems for Client PCs. One Windows OS will Power PCs, Tablets and Smartphones