News
 

Bookmark and Share

(4) 

An overclocker has managed to rather substantially increase the world's frequency record for Advanced Micro Devices' central processing units (CPU) at an overclocking contest hosted by Gigabyte Technologies, one of the largest makers of mainboards.

Utilizing Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD7 mainboard, the overclocker who calls himself Mad222 from Hong Kong managed to overclock AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition processor (3.40GHz) to whopping 7344.48MHz. The computer performance enthusiast used dry ice for cooling. The mainboard was not modified, according to the overclocking.

Based on the "hall of fame" of validated CPU-Z overclocking records, Mad222 substantially increased the overclocking bar for any AMD microprocessor with 7344.48MHz clock-speed as the others are rather substantially behind the leader with 7217.81MHz (Phenom II X4 955), 7153.89MHz (Phenom II X4 955), 7140.39MHz (Phenom II X4 955) and 7127.85MHz (Phenom II X4 955). Gigabyte also claims that two other overclockers, who participated in the contest and used Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD7 mainboards managed to hit 7182.04MHz and 7168.7MHz clock-speeds.

Overclocking microprocessors by almost 100% from their official frequency is not truly uncommon in the world of hardcore overclockers. However, when overclocked, those chips can barely perform any actual job and usually overclockers only run SuperPi test suite. Moreover, systems cooled down using liquid nitrogen or other extreme methods cannot be used for prolonged periods of time. As a result, overclocking records are just records and do not have a lot of practical meaning other than showing reliability of CPUs, mainboards and/or other components.

The world's highest CPU frequency ever reached is 8242.45MHz. The record was set using Intel Celeron 360 microprocessor and Asus Commando mainboard.

Tags: AMD, Phenom, Deneb

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 02/17/11 08:47:07 AM
Latest comment: 02/18/11 10:04:02 AM

[1-4]

1. 
If Intel had stuck with NetBurst, anyone could have that in their homes. No performance though, but still.
0 0 [Posted by: Harry Lloyd  | Date: 02/17/11 08:47:07 AM]
Reply

2. 
NetBurst was a complete failure exactly because it failed to scale in clockspeed despite being built to specifically do so.


Over 100% OC and another raise in the record for AMD chips, not bad at all.
0 0 [Posted by: DIREWOLF75  | Date: 02/17/11 09:38:44 AM]
Reply

3. 
Lol ,Congrat to AMD .One and only AMD ;p
0 0 [Posted by: Blackcode  | Date: 02/17/11 12:30:10 PM]
Reply

4. 
It's quite a bit harder to get 4 cores up to that speed than a single core.
0 0 [Posted by: bbo320  | Date: 02/18/11 10:04:02 AM]
Reply

[1-4]

Add your Comment




Related news

Latest News

Sunday, August 24, 2014

6:12 pm | Former X-Bit Labs Editor Aims to Wed Tabletop Games with Mobile Platforms. Game Master Wants to Become a New World of Warcraft

Thursday, August 21, 2014

10:59 pm | Khronos Group to Follow DirectX 12 with Cross-Platform Low-Level API. Khronos Unveils Next-Generation OpenGL Initiative

10:33 pm | Avexir Readies 3.40GHz DDR4 Memory Modules. DDR4 Could Hit 3.40GHz This Year

12:10 pm | AMD to Lower Prices of A-Series APUs for Back-to-School Season. New Prices of AMD A-Series APUs Revealed

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

10:53 am | AMD to Cut Prices on FX-9000, Other FX Processors: New Prices Revealed. AMD to Make FX Chips More Affordable, Discontinue Low-End Models

10:32 am | LG to Introduce World’s First Curved 21:9 Ultra-Wide Display. LG Brings Curved Displays to Gamers, Professionals

9:59 am | AMD Readies FX-8370, FX-8370E Microprocessors. AMD Preps Two New “Mainstream” FX Chips